Machine Learning Algorithms and Practice 2026 Assignment 1 The goal in this assignment is to craft a classic machine learning solution for an object recognition task. Each object is a 28×28 pixel image. You will get these images as ‘flattened’ 784-dimensional vectors, each tagged with a label (+1 or -1). Data Sources: You can load the data with np.loadtxt. The training data (with labels) and test data (without labels) are available to you at the URL: https://github.com/foxtrotmike/CS909/tree/master/2026/A1 Training Data (Xtrain): Rows of images for you to train your model. Training Labels (Ytrain): The label of each image. Test Data (Xtest): More rows of images for you to test your model. Submission Guide: You must submit a single Jupyter (IPython) Notebook containing all code, figures, and written answers. Your notebook must include the following and is to be submitted using Tabula.: 1.Your name and student ID at the top. For all experiments involving randomness (e.g. data shuffling or cross-validation), use the numeric part of your student ID as the random seed (e.g. u1234567 to 1234567) and report results using this seed. 2.A declaration at the beginning stating whether you used AI tools (e.g. ChatGPT), and in at most two lines, the purpose for which they were used. The use of such tools is permitted provided it is declared and complies with Warwick’s academic integrity principles. All submitted work must be your own; the use of unacknowledged external work (including AI-generated content) will be treated as a serious breach of academic integrity and will be severely penalised in accordance with University regulations. Submissions showing inconsistencies between code, results, and explanations, or raising concerns about authorship or understanding, may be selected for a short follow-up viva in which the student will be asked to explain and defend their work and final marking will be based on that.. 3.All code, outputs, figures, and explanations required to answer the questions. 4.All cells executed in order, with outputs visible, so that results can be verified. 5.A clear summary table comparing the performance metrics of the models you evaluated. 6.Code restricted to the following libraries: numpy, pandas, scipy, sklearn. If additional libraries are used, installation commands (e.g. !pip install …) must be included and justified. 7.Sufficient inline comments and explanations to make your reasoning clear. 8.In addition, you must submit a separate prediction file for the test data: A single-column CSV file containing the prediction score for each example in Xtest, in the original order. The file must be named using your student ID (e.g. u100011.csv). Marking Criteria a.Correctness and completeness of implementation: 20-30% b.Reasoning, interpretation, and diagnostic analysis: 40-50% c.Falsification, robustness analysis, or insightful extensions: 20%

Question No. 1: (Exploring data) [10% Marks] Start by loading the training and test data. Once you have it ready, let’s explore with these questions: i.Dataset Overview a.How many examples of each class are in the training set And in the test set b.Does this distribution of positive and negative examples signify any potential issues in terms of design of the machine learning solution and its evaluation If so, please explain. ii.Visual Data Exploration a.Pick 10 random objects from each class in the training data and display them using plt.matshow. Reshape the flattened 28×28 arrays for this. What patterns or characteristics do you notice b.Do the same for 10 random objects from the test set. Are there any peculiarities in the data that might challenge your classifier’s ability to generalize iii.Choosing the Right Metric Which performance metric would be best for this task (accuracy, AUC-ROC, AUC-PR, F1, Matthews correlation coefficient, mean squared error etc.) Define each metric and discuss your reasoning for this choice. iv.Benchmarking a Random Classifier Imagine a classifier that produces a random prediction score in the range [-1,+1] for a given input example. What metrics (AUC-ROC, AUC-PR, F1, Matthews correlation coefficient, mean squared error etc.) would you expect it to achieve on both the training and test datasets Show this through a coding experiment. v.Benchmarking a “Positive” Classifier Imagine a classifier that produces a positive label (+1) for any given input example. What metrics (AUC-ROC, AUC-PR, F1, Matthews correlation coefficient, mean squared error etc.) would you expect it to achieve on both the training and test datasets Show this through a coding experiment.

Question No. 2: (Nearest Neighbor Classifier) [10% Marks] Perform 5-fold stratified cross-validation (https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/generated/sklearn.model_selection.StratifiedKFold.html) over the training dataset using a k-nearest neighbour (kNN) classifier and answer the following questions: i.Can two images that look very similar to a human be far apart under Euclidean distance Construct or find an example. ii.Start with a k = 5 nearest neighbour classifier. Define and calculate the accuracy, balanced accuracy, AUC-ROC, AUC-PR, F1 and Matthews Correlation Coefficient for each fold using this classifier Show code to demonstrate the results. Calculate the average and standard deviation for each metric across all folds and show these in a single table. As the KNN classifier in sklearn does not support decision_function, be sure to understand and use the predict_proba function for AUC-ROC and AUC-PR calculations or plotting. iii.Plot the ROC and PR curves for one fold. What are your observations about the ROC and PR curves What part of the ROC curve is more important for this problem and why iv.At what value of kkk would kNN become equivalent to a trivial classifier Why v.Identify one training example that is consistently misclassified across folds. What does this tell you about the dataset rather than the model Question No. 3: [20% Marks] Cross-validation of SVM and RFs Use 5-fold stratified cross-validation over training data to choose an optimal classifier between: SVMs (linear, polynomial kernels and Radial Basis Function Kernels) and Random Forest Classifiers. Be sure to tune the hyperparameters of each classifier type (C and kernel type and kernel hyper-parameters for SVMs, the number of trees, depth of trees etc. for the Random Forests etc). Report the cross validation results (mean and standard deviation of accuracy, balanced accuracy, AUC-ROC and AUC-PR across fold) of your best model. You may look into grid search as well as ways of pre-processing data (https://scikit-learn.org/stable/modules/preprocessing.html ) (e.g., mean-standard deviation or standard scaling or min-max scaling). i.Write your strategy for selecting the optimal classifier. Show code to demonstrate the results for each classifier. ii.Show the comparison of these classifiers in a single consolidated table. iii.Plot the ROC curves of all classifiers on the same axes for easy comparison. iv.Plot the PR curves of all classifier on the same axes for comparison. v.Write your observations about the ROC and PR curves. Why might two classifiers have almost identical ROC curves but very different PR curves If you were forced to deploy only one model without retraining, which curve would you trust most and why Question No. 4 [20% Marks] PCA i.Plot the scree graph of PCA and find the number of dimensions that explain 95% variance in the training set. Then reduce the number of dimensions of the training data using PCA to 2 and plot a scatter plot of the training data showing examples of each class in a different color. What are your observations about the data based on these (scree and scatter) plots ii.Reduce the number of dimensions of the training and test data together using PCA to 2 and plot a scatter plot of the training and test data showing examples of each set in a different color (or marker style). What are your observations about the data based on this plot What would it imply if test points project outside the convex hull of training points in PCA space iii.Reduce the number of dimensions of the data using PCA and perform classification. You may want to select different principal components for the classification (not necessarily the first few). What is the (optimal) cross-validation performance of a Kernelized SVM classification with PCA Remember to perform hyperparameter optimization! iv.Plot the first at least 10 PCA basis vectors as 28×28 images using plt.matshow. Which PCA components are easiest for a human to interpret visually Are these the same components that best separate the classes Why or why not v.By applying controlled transformations to the training data and refitting PCA, identify which principal component basis vectors are most affected by (i) uniform brightness increase, (ii) addition of random noise, (iii) randomisation of labels, (iv) horizontal translation, and (v) rotation, and justify your conclusions using visual and quantitative evidence. Question No. 5 Another classification problem [20% Marks] a.Define a binary classification task where each example is labelled by its origin: training set ( 1) or test set (+1). Using 5-fold stratified cross-validation, train a classifier to solve this task and report the mean and standard deviation of the AUC-ROC. b.Interpret the resulting AUC-ROC value as a measure of dataset shift. What does a value close to 0.5, moderately above 0.5, or close to 1.0 imply about the relationship between the training and test sets c.Identify which features or transformations of the data contribute most to separating training and test examples, and provide evidence to support your conclusion. d.Apply data augmentations (random noise and random rotations) to the training data and repeat the experiment. Analyse how and why the AUC-ROC changes, and what this reveals about the nature of the shift. e.Explain how the presence of such a train–test distinction would affect your confidence in the evaluation of classifiers in earlier questions, and describe at least one principled strategy to reduce or eliminate this issue.

Question No. 6 Optimal Pipeline [20% Marks] Using evidence and insights from Questions 1-5, design a complete end-to-end classification pipeline for this task. Your pipeline may include any preprocessing, representation learning, model selection, calibration, and post-processing steps you consider appropriate, but must use only the provided data. You must: a.Clearly describe the structure of your pipeline and justify each design choice in terms of the empirical findings from earlier questions, not generic best practices. b.Identify at least one plausible alternative pipeline that a competent practitioner might choose, explain why it is reasonable, and justify why you did not select it. c.Perform at least one stress test (e.g., perturbations, reduced data, altered preprocessing, or metric sensitivity) and analyse how robust your pipeline is to this change. d.Report and submit the prediction scores produced by your final pipeline on the test set as a single-column file (named using your student ID, e.g., u100011.csv) in the same order as Xtest. e.Explicitly state the main assumption your pipeline relies on, and discuss how violating this assumption would affect your conclusions. Your marks will prioritise coherence, robustness, and defensibility of the pipeline, rather than absolute test-set performance.

MN4238 Sustainable Development and Management Assessment 1: Individual Essay (25%) . Sustainability has become one of the defining issues shaping the decisions of organisations, governments, and societies. Nevertheless, there remain discussions and debates in scholarship and practice as to the perspectives of sustainability that matter and the implications for management. For the first assessment for MN4238, you are required to write a 1,500-word essay answering this question: “With reference to academic literature, critically discuss two differing sustainability worldviews (such as weak/strong, technocentric, ecocentric, or regenerative perspectives) and explain how they might influence management’s role in addressing contemporary sustainability issues.” Marking Criteria Engagement with academic literature Understanding and critical discussion of two sustainability worldviews Understanding of influence of worldviews on management theory/practice Structure, argumentation and coherence Academic writing, presentation and referencing Quality of argument Use of Generative AI For this assessment, you can use Generative AI to support your reading of relevant literature in accordance with Level 2: AI Assisted Idea Generation and Structuring. A copy of the AI Chart is available on Moodle. You are expected to add an Appendix to the Assessment with the following details: Name and version of the generative AI system used Publisher URL of the AI system Prompts used A short description and reflection on you used the tool. Marking Rubric Assessment Criteria Exceptional (17-20) Very Good (14-16) Good (11-13) Satisfactory (10-8) Pass (7) Fail (0-6) Engagement with academic literature Extensive use of high-quality academic sources; strong integration into argument; demonstrates deep understanding of relevant literature Comprehensive range of relevant sources; mostly analytical; demonstrates strong understanding of key literature. Reasonably good range of relevant sources; mostly analytical; sound understanding of relevant literature Adequate sources but limited depth; tends toward description; basic grasp of relevant literature. Understandable but contains errors; referencing inconsistent. Little or no academic literature; major inaccuracies; no meaningful engagement. Understanding and Critical Discussion of Two Sustainability Worldviews Exceptionally clear, accurate, and theoretically rich explanation of two contrasting worldviews; excellent critical comparison; deep understanding of underlying assumptions; strong illustrative examples. Clear, well-informed explanation of two worldviews; good critical comparison; demonstrates sound understanding of assumptions and tensions. Reasonable understanding of two worldviews; some comparison, though limited in depth or precision. Basic explanation of two worldviews but lacking detail or balance; limited comparison. Incomplete or unclear worldview explanation; weak or incorrect comparison. Only one worldview discussed, or major conceptual errors; no comparison. Understanding of influence of worldviews on management theory/practice Excellent insight into how worldviews shape management theory and practice; strong links between theory and real-world implications. Clear and accurate explanation of how worldviews influence management; links are well-made and relevant. Some good points about influence on management; links present but may be general or uneven. Basic discussion of relevance to management; links may be underdeveloped or generic. Very weak or unclear links between worldview and management; relevance poorly explained. No meaningful discussion of management implications; irrelevant, incorrect, or absent content. Structure, argumentation and coherence Excellent structure; argument is coherent, logical, and highly persuasive; excellent signposting. Well-structured and coherent argument; minor lapses in flow. Generally clear structure but with some issues in flow or logic. Structure is present but somewhat unclear or disjointed. Poorly organised; argument difficult to follow. Structure absent or incoherent; argument missing. Academic writing, presentation and referencing Clear, fluent academic writing; accurate and consistent referencing. Mostly clear writing; referencing generally accurate. Writing understandable but with stylistic or grammatical issues; referencing contains inconsistencies. Writing sometimes unclear; noticeable errors; referencing incomplete or inconsistently applied. Writing unclear in places; frequent errors; referencing weak or incomplete. Writing unclear or inappropriate for academic work; referencing incorrect, inconsistent, or

MN4100 – Contemporary Issues in Management 2025/26 Assessment Guidance Assignment 2: CASE STUDY REPORT (INDIVIDUAL) Length: 3,000 words excluding references Deadline: Monday 13th April (Week 11) Noon Weight: 70% of the module grade

Guidance on the Assignment: You will critically analyse literature from a topic in MN4100, apply this to a real-world organisational context of your choice which is facing a grand challenge, and provide practical recommendations for this organisation informed by your analysis. You will also reflect on how this case study analysis intersects with another topic you have studied during your Management degree*, and how it has prompted you to re-think your prior learning. This assignment will draw on topics covered in Weeks 1-11 of Semester 2. This assignment is designed to integrate your learning from MN4100 and across your Management degree.

• For students who have spent their entire degree at St Andrews, this refers to MN-coded modules. For visiting students or those who have studied abroad, topics taught in these Management modules may also be included. Please contact Dr Neville if you need to discuss further. Please note all assessments on this module should use the appropriate assessment cover sheet (found on Moodle) and be uploaded to MMS in pdf form. This is to allow us to upload your assignment to the marking software Learning Outcomes This assignment relates to all of the Learning Outcomes identified in the Module Guide: Communicate professionally and effectively using a variety of media Reflect on skills and knowledge acquired at University Understand the nature and complexity of contemporary challenges for management in a variety of organisations Critically discuss these challenges and their impact to offer viable organisational solutions Suggested word counts Executive summary: 200 words Introduction to chosen organisation and the grand challenge it faces: 1000 words Literature review of chosen MN4100 topic as applied to the organisation: 1000 words Recommendations for the organisation based on your literature review (written for professional non-academic audience): 400 words Reflection on how this case study analysis intersects with another topic studied during your Management degree, and how it has prompted you to re-think your prior learning: 400 words General Information for Assignment Please try to pick something original for your chosen organisation and avoid the “usual suspects” (Tesla/Apple/Uber etc.). You cannot choose an organisation which you have studied for a previous assignment. For this assessment, the use of Generative AI tools (such as ChatGPT, Gemini, or any similar platforms) is strictly prohibited. You are expected to complete this assessment independently. The assignment should include academic literature referenced using the Harvard reference style (see Honours Handbook on Moodle for more information on Harvard reference style). A reference list should be included. This is not included in the word limit. A ten per cent margin over the specific word count is allowed. You should give your assignment a suitable title. All pages should be numbered. Marking Rubric for Assessment 2 A B C D E Identification of issues and context Clear and coherent identification of issues with concise discussion on context. Identification of issue with appropriate discussion of context. Identification of issue and some discussion of context with some erroneous information. Limited discussion of context which makes issue difficult to understand. No identification of issue. Incoherent discussion of context. Appropriate use of supporting references and evidence All claims are supported by sources which are appropriate and accurately referenced. Appropriate sources have been used to evidence most claims. There are some minor referencing errors. Appropriate sources have been used to evidence some claims. There are frequent referencing errors. Some evidence of engagement with sources. There is minimal attempt to reference. There is no attempt to reference works used. Critical, in depth and balanced analysis Nuanced critical analysis of context from multiple perspectives. Clear attempt to critically analyse context from multiple perspectives. Some critical analysis but moments where analysis needs further depth and/or balance. Some attempt to critically analyse context but superficial and primarily takes one point of view. Superficial, descriptive writing. Structure and clarity of writing Excellent structure with appropriate use of signposting and language for audience. Clear attempt to provide coherent report with some minor flaws in structure and/or tone. Presents a basic structure for report with some moments of incoherence. No consistency in tone. Report lacks clear structure. Inappropriate tone for audience at points. Report structure is confusing and written in inappropriate tone for audience. Insightful identification of consequences for practice Excellent and creative links to consequences for practice. Clear identification of consequences for practice. Some attempt to link consequences for practice but requires further justification. A limited attempt to link consequences for practice. No attempt to identify consequences for practice. Undergraduate Programmes STUDENT ID NUMBER: MODULE NUMBER: MN4100 MODULE TITLE: Contemporary Issues in Management TOPIC/ASSIGMENT TITLE: Assignment 2 – Case Study Report MODULE COORDINATOR: Dr Fergus Neville WORD COUNT: 3000 DEADLINE DATE: 13th April 2026, 12pm In submitting this assignment I hereby confirm that: I have read and understood the University’s policy on academic misconduct I confirm that this assignment is all my own work I confirm that in preparing this piece of work I have not copied any other person’s work, or any other pieces of my own work I confirm that this piece of work has not previously been submitted for assessment on another programme

ETHICAL SYSTEM POSITION ON SEXUAL OR GENDER ETHICS ISSUE RESEARCH

PAPER ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS

OVERVIEW

This assignment is a scholarly paper that builds upon the knowledge and skills developed in the first 3 weeks of the course. Each student will write a 1000–1500-word essay (word count doesn’t include the title page, table of contents, and bibliography, but does include the footnotes) that applies your chosen ethical system argued in Discussion: Choosing an Ethical System to one specific sexual or gender related ethical issue presented in the assigned reading. Abortion, while

an important issue, does not qualify as topic for this assignment. Example of specific ethical

topics would be gay marriage, polygamy, pornography, trans athletes, gender-affirming care, and

other specific topics found in your assigned reading. The key is to be specific! No papers on

generic assessments of “Christian sexuality” vs. “non-Christian sexuality.” Format should be

12pt, Times New Roman font and use full Turabian format.

INSTRUCTIONS

Begin your paper with a brief introductory paragraph that clearly states your goals, thesis, and

method. This introduction should state:

1. What metaethical theory you are using;

2. The ethical theory you are contrasting it against;

3. The specific ethical issue you are addressing; and

4. A very brief conclusion on that issue that you want to defend.

Either your chosen ethical system or your contrasting ethical system must be Magnuson’s

Christian ethical system, in order to show that you have at least understood the curriculum from

a Christian perspective.

Next, provide a lengthy and detailed comparative analysis of the two ethical systems—Christian

ethics and another system—showing which theory is stronger. This will likely reflect what you

argued for in your Discussion: Choosing an Ethical System and the feedback that you received

from the professor and/or classmates who responded to your thread. Here you can go into more

detail than you could in the Discussion.

Next, proceed to the applied sexual or gender ethics issue. Here you should greatly expand upon

your argument. Add detail, nuance, and argumentation, providing a fairly complete and

comprehensive argument for how Christian ethics would approach this issue. It may be helpful to

use Rae’s 7-Step Moral Decision Making Process from Chap. 2 of Magnuson, but it is not

required. Or, if you defended a non-Christian ethical system in Discussion: Choosing an Ethical

System, formulate an application based on that theory using a decision making system consistent

with your chosen ethical system. You may illustrate the issue with minimal real-life examples,

but please do not fill your paper with anecdotes from your life or others. You should anticipate

possible objections to your approach to the issue and respond to them in an objective and

informed manner. For ideas on how others might object to your approach, a good place to begin

would be your classmate’s replies to your Discussion threads. You are encouraged to use quotes

from sources as a way to support your arguments, but quotes should not make up more than 300

words from your wordcount.

ETHC 205

Page 2 of 3

Your final paragraph should reflect what you have argued in your thesis. It should recap what

you have accomplished and how you have accomplished it.

Research

The paper must include at least one citation from both of the two course textbooks in

addition to at least one citation from the Bible. Other acceptable sources include peer-

reviewed journal articles and scholarly books from the JF Library. If you’re unsure, then ask. All

resources used must be listed in your paper’s bibliography page and any resources quoted,

paraphrased, or alluded to must be documented via footnotes formatted according to Turabian.

Please understand that it is not enough to simply cite word for word material with a footnote, you

must put word for word text from a source in quotation marks or it is considered plagiarism.

Format

Your paper must begin with a title page that includes a paper title, your name, the date, and the

course name and number. The second page of your paper must be a table of contents. The last

page of your paper must be devoted to your bibliography. The paper must utilize 12 point Times

New Roman font and be double-spaced, with one inch margins. It must be double-spaced rather

than triple-spaced between paragraphs and there should be only one space after the end of each

sentence.

Any documentation in the body of your paper must be done via footnotes formatted according to

Turabian, unless you are citing or quoting the Bible. If you are not familiar with how to do this,

simply look it up on Liberty’s Turabian resource page. Footnotes should be single-spaced 12

point Times New Roman font.

Your paper must be submitted as a Microsoft Word document. If you submit it as a .pdf or

anything other than a Microsoft Word document it will not be graded. Please use the paper

template supplied in this Module if you need help.

Format Example

Title Page

Table of Contents

Body of Paper:

• Introduction

• Ethical Systems Presentation and Argumentation

• Application of Ethical Systems on Ethical Issue

• Conclusion

Bibliography

Miscellany

Proofread your work before handing it in! Errors of spelling, grammar, syntax, and punctuation

will affect your grade. This is a university-level writing assignment. Please write accordingly.

ETHC 205

Page 3 of 3

By completing this assignment, you affirm that all work submitted in this document is your own

work and therefore adheres to the Liberty Way standards for academic integrity. Your work does

not contain answers generated by AI, provided to you by someone else, or is in any way in

violation of the Liberty Way. You recognize that failure to abide by these academic standards

may result in a reduced grade, failing grade, and/or further disciplinary action by the university

in accordance with university policy.

Note: Your assignment will be checked for originality via the Turnitin plagiarism tool.

EVD5 – Coursework Information for Academic year 2025-2026 Engineering Vibrations and Dynamics 5 (EVD5) The assessment of Engineering Vibrations and Dynamics (EVD5) course you are required to conduct a coursework which holds 100% of the total grade of the course consisting in two parts: Part I – Technical review report (20%) and Part II – Technical simulation report (80%). The coursework should be conducted individually. Please submit the two parts as a combined single file. The submission deadline of the coursework is by Tuesday, 21st April 2026 at 14:00. Part I – Technical review report (20%) In this part, students are required to conduct a technical review of their chosen topic by analysing one paper selected from the provided list of publications. All topics are interconnected through the content of the course. A supporting book chapter will also be provided, focusing on Environmental and Operational Variabilities (EOV). If the selected topic does not explicitly address EOV, students should include a reflec tion on how an EOV mitigation technique could be applied within the context of the chosen journal paper. The technical review report should be limited to three pages, with an additional page allowed for references. The aim of the proposed report is to provide a thorough review of a particular vibration-based analysis or methodology, enabling an engineer interested in the technique to understand the research question addressed, the methodology, experimental approach, technical aspects, and the challenges associated with the topic. More specifically, the technical review report should implicitly address the following questions: What is the research statement of the work How the content of EVD5, both theoretical and descriptive (methodologically) can be related to the work How the theoretical fundamentals have facilitated the outcomes of the work Identify and reflect on the innovations proposed in the work How the work can be extrapolated to other fields or studies You are advised to use the following structure for your technical review report; however, adherence to this structure is not mandatory. Abstract. Your abstract should be between 100-150 words. It should summarise the main aim of the report given an indication of the research question addressed, methodology and main general findings. Introduction and Motivation. This includes the introduction, background section and problem statement. The introductory sections set the scene. They do this by providing some basic background information and introducing the research question that your report will be addressing. You should focus on explaining why this question is important. A final paragraph in the introduction setting out the structure of the paper is also helpful. Theoretical fundamentals and Methodology. Describe and define the theoretical fundamentals on what the work has been set. Try to bring the content learnt during the course for a comprehensive reflection. What are the approaches conducted What are the main assumptions How the methodology has been defined and what are the contribu tions of each step on the global study Experimental and/or Validation of the work. How the experimental campaign has been defined and what assumptions have been made to facilitate the experiment and validation of the work. Which instrumentation has been used How the data has been acquired Also, how would you have complemented the study to provide a more comprehensive study Discussion and Innovations. What are the innovations presented in the work How the work has built up on the fundamentals to address the research statement under consideration Conclusions and Limitations. The conclusions section should summarise the most important points of your technical report. Also reflect on the main impact of the work and how this can be extrapolated to further analysis, applica tions. You should also be able to identify the limitations of the work and what could be a changed to overtake the challenges that this work has aroused. References You should include the full citation to referenced documents using a recognised referencing system (e.g. Harvard, Vancouver . . . ). A recommended number of 10 references is appropriated for this report. Part II – Technical simulation report (80%) A platform is supported by a beam as illustrated in the Figure 1. The owner of the installation has concerns due to the potential deterioration of the beam because it is exposed to severe operational conditions and thus prone to failure. The owner is looking for engineering experts in the field of structural dynamics as they are looking for installing a vibration-based system to evaluate potential deterioration of the structural element. The structure is intended to be instrumented with accelerometers along the span of the beam (see Figure 1) to measure in the longitudinal direction. The structural manager of the company has listed the requirements for this project and they require a well-justified with evidence report to take the appropriate decisions. The owner also requests any additional suggestions or innovations beyond the stated requirements. Figure 1: Graphical representation of the structure. Specifications: Diameter: d=30cm Length: L=5m Material steel Elastic modulus: E= 200 GPa Density: ρ= 7800 kg/m3 A technical simulation report has been asked by the company with maximum five pages and it should contain the following points:

1. Construct the free body diagram and derive the corresponding equation of motion for every degree of-freedom.
2. Calculate the theoretical modal parameters of the structure.
3. Assuming proportional damping, calculate the modal damping ratios of the structure.
4. Calculate the Frequency Response Function (FRF) of each degree of freedom in respect to the excita tion point at a fixed point.
5. An experimental modal analysis is to be performed before the structure will be in operation thus the model could be validated. Compare with those obtained in step 2.
6. Now, model the system in the state-space form and using Runge Kutta or matrix exponential method solve it numerically to obtain the structural displacements, velocities and accelerations for a random excitation at all the degree of freedom.
7. Calculate the Power Spectral Densities of the responses at each degree of freedom. How do they compare with the theoretical FRFs
8. Using the model in 6, assume the system to be output-only and apply Operational Modal Analysis (OMA) to the system considering all the degree of freedom and estimate A and C matrices. Estimate the modal parameters (natural frequencies, damping ratios and mode shapes) and comment in the assumptions/parameters selected. Then, compare with ones estimated in step 2 a 5. The structure is sometimes exposed to 400 Celsius due to its operation, which reduces the Elastic Modulus of the steel to 180GPa.
9. Please recalculate the modal parameters in the step 2 and in the step 4. As well as the estimation of the modal parameters estimated as in the step 8.
10. Discuss and evaluate the consequences when comparing before and after the extreme temperature chang

MED056-1 Content Creation and Post-Production Assessment 2 Brief 2026/27 | Bedfordshire

MED056-1 Content Creation and Post-Production Assessment Type Practical – multi-platform portfolio Assessment Title Assessment 2 Assignment TWO Brief |UG | AY25-26 MED56-1 CCPP Key assignment details

Unit title & code

MED056-1 CONTENT CREATION AND POST-PRODUCTION

Assignment number & title

ASSESSMENT TWO

Assignment type

Practical – multi-platform portfolio

Weighting of assignment

60%

Size or length of assessment

 

Portfolio of work: Minimum of Three social media shorts (1 –2 min each), a 500-word reflective essay & evidence folder to show planning.

Use of generative AI

Not permitted: however. Planning/grammar assistance permitted with declaration. All footage, edits, captions and mixes must be student‑produced. No AI‑generated video/voice/music.

Use of self-plagiarism

Not permitted

Understanding the assignment brief

Assignment brief to be discussed during an in-class session with students within the first 2 weeks of the unit.

21/1/26

22/1/26

Uploaded screen/podcast explaining the assessment, the rubric and marking criteria.

Link on BREO

What am I required to do in this assignment? Produce a creative and well researched portfolio of content for social media and multiplatform audiences Demonstrate an understanding of the principles, technique and craft of content creation

Detailed deliverables: A. Three Social Media Shorts (minimum of 1min each no more than 2 mins):

Short 1 – ONLINE NEWS STORY: A 300-400 word article on WORDPRESS to report on a timely and relevant news topic. This must contain a 1 minute “Social Media Short” video in 16:9 format embedded into the post. This needs to be a video with text/captions, and music. The story must be clear on mute. Short 2 – TIK TOK style “PROCESS” video” energetic micro‑narrative with purposeful pacing and tasteful SFX/music. For example: “How to …..”  Short 3 – PROMOTE A BRAND: Market a product: A value proposition with a clear marketing narrative . You will be given a clear ‘client brief’ and will create a short 1 minute promotional video to promote ‘Sole-Mates” (Permasox). The brief will be uploaded to BREO in the Assessment Folder. Each short must open with a strong hook in the first 1–3 seconds and include captions or text overlays within safe zones.

B. Production Evidence Folder (ZIP): Example: Shot lists/storyboards, location notes & risk considerations, consent forms, export setting screenshots where applicable. C. Reflection (500 words total): Audience & Platform Fit: Who is it for? Why this platform approach? Craft Choices: Hooks, pacing, captions, sound; what you changed after feedback and why. Legal/Ethical: Consent/releases, location, music licensing, accessibility steps taken. Show some contextual understanding of the task, and honest reflection on the process How? :

Think deeply about the following aspects of your 3 practical pieces. Say why you made certain decisions and reflect on what did and what did not go well, and your own new learning. Read about the theory and show how you linked theory and practice in your work and how you could do this better in future.

Production Evidence Folder (ZIP): Shot lists/storyboards, location notes & risk considerations, consent forms, export setting screenshots.  You should engage with all lessons and produce work across your 11 weeks of classes. Upload all your work as a zip file . We will go over this in class.  Note that the Reflective Essay needs a separate cover page with your student name, student number, Unit name, Assessment Name and Number.

What do I need to do to pass? How do I achieve a good grade?  You must ensure attendance to all classes in this unit, across the 11 weeks. Please don’t be late for classes as the teaching can’t be repeated.  Engage in homework and practice reflective writing. DO all technical/practical tasks asked of you and read and respond to any formative feedback given to help you improve on your work. Do independent research and learning.

What do I need to do to pass? How do I achieve a good grade? Pass threshold (40–49%): Three pieces of practical work in the form of online text and videos submitted meeting duration/format; basic hooks and captions; some evidence of audience/platform understanding; legal/ethical basics demonstrated; reflection present with references. Good (50–69%): Clear hooks, readable shots and captions; coherent pacing; sound mix supports clarity; platform fit evident; thoughtful reflection linking choices to feedback and sources. Excellent (70%+): Highly engaging, purposeful storytelling; precise pacing and audio design; captions polished and accessible; sharp platform reasoning; exemplary legal/ethical practice; concise, insightful reflection referencing high quality sources. How will my assignment be marked? Your assignment will be marked according to the threshold expectations (see the Unit Information Form uploaded on BREO) and the specific marking criteria below (marking rubric). Please read carefully as they will help you prepare and evaluate your own work before you submit. They will also help you understand the grade and feedback received once marked.

 

70%+

(1st Class)

60-69%

(2:1)

50-59%

(2:2)

40-49%

(3rd Class)

Threshold Standard

30-39%

(Fail)

0-29%

(Fail)

1

Ambition and Execution

Your coursework shows excellent effort in producing content, and execution.

Ambition and Execution

Your coursework shows very good effort in producing content, and execution.

Ambition and Execution

Your coursework shows good effort in producing content, and execution.

Ambition and Execution

Your coursework shows some effort in producing content but is quite basic in places in terms of content and execution.

Ambition and Execution

Your coursework shows limited effort in producing content, with little evidence of purposeful content or execution.

Ambition and Execution

Your coursework shows no effort in producing content or execution and does not meet the task requirements.

2

Awareness of Codes and Conventions

Your project shows an excellent awareness of the codes and conventions in your genre of production.

Awareness of Codes and Conventions

 

Your project shows a very good awareness of the codes and conventions in your genre of production.

Awareness of Codes and Conventions

 

Your project shows a

good awareness of the codes and conventions in your genre of production.

Awareness of Codes and Conventions

 

Your coursework shows some awareness of image-making and storytelling codes and conventions.

Awareness of Codes and Conventions

 

Your coursework shows very limited awareness of codes and conventions, with little evidence of applying them.

Awareness of Codes and Conventions

 

Your coursework shows no awareness or understanding of codes and conventions.

3

Technical Skills

Your work demonstrates excellent technical skills and a mastery of the equipment used.

Technical Skills

Your work demonstrated very good technical skills.

Technical Skills

Your work demonstrated good technical skills.

Technical Skills

Your work displays a fair amount of technical skill.

Technical Skills

Your work displays limited technical ability, with frequent errors or incomplete use of equipment.

Technical Skills

Your work displays no meaningful technical skill and does not meet the requirements of the task.

4

Engagement with Production Process

Your work evidences a full engagement with the production process across the unit.

Engagement with Production Process

Your work shows a very good engagement with the production process across the unit.

Engagement with Production Process

Your work shows a good engagement with the production process across the unit.

Engagement with Production Process

Your work shows some engagement with the production process across the unit.

Engagement with Production Process

Your work shows very limited engagement with the production process, with little evidence of development.

Engagement with Production Process

Your work shows no engagement with the production process.

5

Academic Skills

You have consistently applied core academic skills accurately and effectively throughout your written work, demonstrating an excellent understanding of how to engage with reflective writing.

Academic Skills

 

You have used core academic skills appropriately and competently in referencing, formatting, and use of academic English.

Academic Skills

 

You have displayed core academic skills in referencing, formatting, and use of academic English.

Academic Skills

 

You have displayed some academic skills in referencing, formatting, and use of academic English.

Academic Skills

 

You have displayed very limited academic skills, with frequent errors in referencing, formatting, and use of academic English.

Academic Skills

 

You have shown no

evidence of core academic skills; referencing and academic writing are absent or incorrect

SG5011 Sustainable Operations and Supply Chain Management Assessment Term Module Title SG5011 Sustainable Operations and Supply Chain Management Academic Year 2026-27 SG5011 Sustainable Operations and Supply Chain Management Assessment Assessment 1.1 Summary    Weighting: 100% of module marks. Individual report: Approx. 2,000 – 60% Submission deadline: 23 April 2025, 15.00 Two (2) LinkedIn Learning Certificate – 10%  Group presentation – 30% Learning Outcomes Evidenced by this assignment: 1 to 4 Submission procedure: Submission should be through Turnitin.  No hard copy submission will be accepted.   Return of feedback and marked work: Your marked assignment and individual feedback will be made available through Turnitin   1.2 Structure of the assignment    There is one coursework to be submitted for this component. It has two parts:  Part A: Individual Report (and 2 LinkedIn Certificates) Part B: Group Presentation 1.3 Details of the assessment task Part A: Individual Report (60%) Choose a company and select three of the theories covered during seminars. Use the theories demonstrated in these presentations to assess the sustainability of the organisation and to show how the use of information technology (IT) can help maximise organisational performance.   The following assignment instructions provide a more detailed explanation of the requirements for the report submission.   Details of the task   This part of the assignment requires you to:  Assess existing practice using operational planning, operations theory, concepts and tools. Compare the operations with best practice. Suggest a reason for your findings. Identify how IT helps or could help deliver efficient operations. During the semester, you should have created and discussed a range of formative and summative presentations that include an explanation of theory. You are not expected to describe the theory a second time.  You are expected to use it. Your research should focus on establishing the nature of operations in your chosen case study.    You are now in a position to complete the written part of your submission: The body of your assessment should focus on reapplying those tools and theories to your chosen organisation to establish the extent to which it demonstrates good practice.   The list of companies is available below. Please make sure you select only one organisation from the list below and submit the final assessment (Individual submission) based on the selected organisation/company.

1. Shell
2. Bridgestone
3. M&S
4. Samsung
5. Superdry
6. McDonald’s
7. Iceland
8. Nando’s
9. Costco
10. BP plc    A suggested structure for your report:   If you choose to structure the main body of your work in a different way, make sure you provide similar coverage of the material.    Introduction: (Approx. 200 words)
11. Introduce the key topics of the report (This will include the organisation concerned, its key operational plan & activities and how stakeholders and their requirements are identified by the organisation).  A common error is for students to think this relates to the historical development of the issue when its past often has little relevance to current situations. This background material should make the purpose of the report relevant.  You may find it appropriate even at this early stage to use theoretical concepts.
12. Explain the purpose of the report. This should be phrased in the terms you would expect to use if the report were to be handed as a professional consultancy report to the organisation concerned and other readers.
13. Outline the structure of your response.
14. Define any key terms (this might have been achieved in “1” above).
15. Be engaging and professional.  By this, you should try to avoid the trap of starting the report with the words “in this report I am going to …” or similar.   Main Body: (Approx. 1,600 words)   Keep the headings informative, and remember that “main body” is not appropriate.   Section 1: Outline the product and service, including delivery, quality standards, and supply chain, an associated process and the usage of ICT.  You should aim at only including descriptions that you will rely on to substantiate your analysis.   Section 2: Analysis of the organisation: Using diagnostic tools (Ex, Performance Measures-QSDFC, Quality audit, service scope, etc)  Comparing with the theory  Show the extent to which the operation is demonstrating good practice.  Indicate Good practice and/or Indicate where there is room for continuous improvement and change / the operation deviates from the theoretical model of good practice.  Section 3: Explain your findings: If your analysis suggests that the organisation is only demonstrating good practice, your analysis will need to be thorough, and this section will not be needed. If your analysis suggests that the operation deviates from good practice / theoretical models, then this section should explain the reasons for this.   Conclusion: (Approx. 200 words)   This should: Briefly refer back to your task Summarise the key issues raised in sections 1 – 3 of the main body. Summarise your findings It should not: Contain any information that has not been discussed in the main body, Summarise the topics covered – e.g. “this report reviewed the operations undertaken and identified where improvements can be made.” without summarising the actual content (a common mistake). Contain any recommendations. The recommended format, referencing and use of quotations for Part A.   Your work should be word processed in accordance with the following:   Font size 12, using Arial, Calibri or Times New Roman font.  Line spacing of 1.5 should be used. Distribute the text evenly between the margins (Justify).  The page orientation should be ‘portrait’ (large diagrams and tables can be in landscape orientation if that enables them to fit on fewer pages) Margins on both sides of the page should be no less than 2 cm. Pages should be numbered. Your name should not appear on the script. – just student number (in some cases, where you’re asked to provide certificates/evidence with your name on, this usual rule does not apply) Your student number should be included on every page. Care should be taken with grammar and spelling, and Harvard Style referencing, as shown in Cite Them Right, must be followed. https://www.citethemrightonline.com/ Provide your word count at the end of the report. If you prepare a good answer, you will probably find the word limit quite tight:   Do make sure that you make sure that all your content is relevant.  Do not repeat anything that is covered in your seminar presentations. Remember: You are not just presenting information.  You should try to persuade your reader that you are right. Two (2) LinkedIn Learning Certificate/Badges – 10%   Two Professional Learning Certificates/Badges (5% each) will contribute to the remaining 10% of the marks.   This part of your work will be based on learning ‘certificates/badges’. A learning badge is a certificate that a person will get when an institution validates the accomplishment of a learning activity, such as a workshop, conference, social work or any educational strategy. The badges to be learned and earned are in alignment with this component’s learning and engagement. The Badges would be earned from the LinkedIn Learning platform. The details are as follows:    You will get guidance in your lectures and on the SG5011 module site that you MUST follow – this will show you how to use your UEL LinkedIn Learning Account (do not use your personal LinkedIn account for this – for reasons that will be made clear) – and show you how to access the correct courses to achieve your certificates. LINKS TO THE CORRECT COURSES ARE PROVIDED ON THE MOODLE PAGE FOR SG5011 We have also provided important guidance on the correct way to use LinkedIn Learning here: https://moodle.uel.ac.uk/course/view.php?id=79540   For both of the above, see the ‘Assessment and feedback’ tab on SG5011 MOODLE page. You should have both LinkedIn certificates of completion and be attached in the main submission after Part A. The Certificate of Completion must clearly show your name as per UEL records, the name of the course, and the Completion Date.  You will be asked to provide an original PDF copy by the module leader; therefore, please ensure you keep the original copy safe on email or cloud.  An example of a certificate is shown below. It clearly shows the name (Shams Aujara), Name of Course: Quality Management Foundations, Completion Date: Jan 25, 2026, at 10.40 AM.  Part B: Group Presentation (30%) For this assessment, the group presentations developed and discussed during seminar sessions will contribute 30% of the overall module mark. The presentations will be delivered in Weeks 8 and 9.   Marks for this component will be awarded at the point of seminar presentation by the seminar tutor. A soft copy of the presentation slides (with Student IDs on the front page) must also be submitted to Turnitin by the stipulated deadline.   Where students intend to submit the seminar presentation without further amendment, they must clearly list the relevant presentation(s) on the assessment front sheet.   Students are required to work in groups of no more than five (5) members.   Full details of the group presentation requirements will be made available on the Moodle page and discussed during seminar classes. The seminar tutor will allocate a case study company to each group.   a) Assessment Criteria   Marking criteria

Weight

Part A (Report)

 

Provision of necessary background information

10%

The application of concepts and tools

20%

Analysis of the operation

20%

Overall presentation, including referencing

10%

 

 

2 badges/certificates of completion uploaded by the student

10%

Part B (Appendix):

 

Marks for the best two presentations will be added by the seminar tutor

30%

 

 

Total

100%

Assessment Criteria Explained.   Provision of Necessary Background Information. The extent to which it fits the subsequent analysis.   Application of concepts and tools The accuracy and understanding of the concepts and tools that are demonstrated.   Analysis of the operation Your conclusion, including the supporting reasoning.  Could this report be given to the company concerned?  Would they consider it demonstrates sufficient understanding of their particular situation?   Presentation Structure, writing style and referencing technique   Assessment Standards

Grade Level Description First (70% or above) Ideas critically analysed. The argument is clear, succinct and well supported. Evidence of a wide range of reading and some independent thought. Upper second (60-69%) Critical consideration of relevant ideas. Arguments are precisely defined and appropriately referenced. The work is structurally sound written. Lower second (50-59%) Reasonable understanding of the relevant concepts, but some inconsistencies in application. Arguments are referenced, but disjointed. Poor structure, spelling or grammar. Third (40-49%) Generally descriptive work with limited evidence of a critical consideration of ideas. Inadequate referencing. Weaknesses in structure, spelling and grammar. Fail (below 40%) Uncritical. Poorly referenced. The argument indicates little use of relevant literature. Chaotic structure and is generally badly written. No reference to theory.

Additional Formative, Unmarked Assessment   This coursework’s weight in the overall module is 100%. There is no other component than the assessment component specified in this assessment guide.   b)Further important assessment task notes   General remarks:   No Abstract – Please note that an abstract shall not be added.   Embed all own figures in text (not in an appendix) and embed own tables as well as tables essential for understanding into the text sections as well (not in appendices). Use a maximum of three figures and five tables.    Appendices – Extensive appendices should be avoided. Pure raw data tables do not add to the word count and may be appropriate to document scattered data sources.    The references list section is excluded from the word count.   Remarks regarding the choice of topic:   Please make sure that there is data publicly available or well documented in press or trade publications. Do not choose case examples where information is not accessible. The choice of the material and case is up to you, and marking cannot accommodate a lack of insight due to a poor choice of material.   Do not choose a case that you have found fully written up online or in a book. You must not rewrite an already published case study.   c) Reassessment   If a student fails to score 40% marks for the module, then the student will have to do re-sit/reassessment/resubmission.   For the re-sit assignment (as per continuous assessment policy), the same task outlined in this document applies. However, you will have to improve your first submission based on the feedback and comments provided by the tutor. Deadlines and any further terms, if applicable, for the re-sit assessment will be published on the Moodle site in due course.   Re-sit assessment support will be provided, with appointments to be arranged.   d) Late submission and extenuation   We strongly suggest that you try to submit all coursework by the deadline. However, in our regulations, UEL permits students to submit their coursework up to 24 hours after the deadline. The deadline is published in this module guide. Coursework which is submitted late, but within 24 hours of the deadline, will be assessed but subjected to a fixed penalty of 5% of the total marks available (as opposed to marks obtained). This is, 5 out of 100 total marks available.   If you submit twice, once before the deadline and once during the 24 hour late period, then the second submission will be marked and 5% of the total marks available deducted. This rule only applies to coursework. It does not apply to examinations, presentations, performances, practical assessments or viva voce examinations. If you miss these for a genuine reason, then you will need to apply for extenuating circumstances, or accept that you will receive a zero mark.   Please refer to the UEL intranet for our Extenuation Policies. Extenuation requires a proper formal application and cannot be just agreed with the faculty. The links to the forms and policies are provided on the module’s Moodle site.   Further information is available in the Assessment and Feedback Policy at https://www.uel.ac.uk/Discover/Governance/Policies-Regulations-Corporate-documents/Student-Policies (click on other policies)   e) Guidance on referencing   As a student, you will be taught how to write correctly referenced essays using UEL’s standard Harvard referencing system from Cite Them Right. Cite them Right is the standard Harvard referencing style at UEL for all Schools apart from the School of Psychology which uses the APA system. This book will teach you all you need to know about Harvard referencing, plagiarism and collusion. The electronic version of “Cite Them Right: the essential referencing guide”, 9th edition, can be accessed whilst on or off campus, via UEL Direct. The book can only be read online and no part of it can be printed nor downloaded. Further information is available at: https://uelac.sharepoint.com/LibraryandLearningServices/Pages/default.aspx   f) Details of submission procedure   Word count tariffs:   Your word count does not include your contents page, the reference list and the pure data tables in appendices. Exceeding the maximum word count will result in a penalty of 10% of your marks for your work. If your work is significantly shorter than 1700 words, then you will probably have failed to provide a reasonable level of detail required.   Submitting Assessments Using Turnitin:   Notice is hereby given that all submissions must be submitted to Turnitin. If you fail to submit the coursework to Turnitin, in accordance with the guidance provided on the Virtual Learning Environment (Moodle), a mark of 0 will be awarded for the component.   There are two main reasons we want you to use Turnitin: Turnitin can help you avoid academic breaches and plagiarism. When you use Turnitin before a submission deadline, you can use the Originality Report feature to compare your work to thousands of other sources (like websites, Wikipedia, and even other student papers). Anything in your work that identically matches another source is highlighted for you to see. When you use this feature before the deadline, you will have time to revise your work to avoid an instance of academic breach/plagiarism. Turnitin saves paper. When using Turnitin to electronically submit your work, you will seldom have to submit a paper copy.  Late Submissions Using Turnitin   UEL has permitted students to be able to submit their coursework up to 24 hours after the deadline. Assessments that are submitted up to 24 hours late are still marked, but with a 5% deduction. However, you have to be very careful when you are submitting your assessment. If you submit your work twice, once using the original deadline link and then again using the late submission link on Turnitin, your assignment will be graded as late with the penalty deduction (see previous section “Late submission and extenuation”).   Turnitin System Failure   Please don’t wait until the last minute to submit your assessments electronically. If you experience a problem submitting your work with Turnitin, you should notify your lecturer/tutor by email immediately. However, deadlines are not extended unless there is a significant system problem with Turnitin. UEL has specific plans in place to address these issues. If UEL finds that the issue with the system was significant, you will receive an email notifying you of the issue and that you have been given a 24-hour extension. If you don’t receive any email that specifically states you have been given an extension, then the original deadline has not been changed.    To claim any significant issue with IT, you shall have contacted the IT Helpdesk via The Hub first and provided tangible evidence to the lecturers concerning the IT issue.   g) Feedback and return of work   Marked work:   Feedback for the submitted coursework will be provided via Turnitin. Students, please access that feedback via the TurnItIn link on the module’s Moodle site. The seminar tutors are available in their office hours, where a meeting on the feedback was required and appropriate.   Marks will be disseminated electronically as well, via GradeMark.   Assessment Support:   Assessment support has been designed into the module programme. Students should make sure that they have identified specific questions for these events. Students who miss the assessment clinics but seek additional advice will need to justify this behaviour with good causes.   Peer support – Although it might be useful to discuss your ideas and views, please carefully note: The assignment is an individual task. You must not collaborate on the assignment. We have zero tolerance for collusion and plagiarism.

BMS5002 Infectious Diseases Assessment Two : Diagnostic Algorithm 2026 |

BMS5002 Infectious Diseases Word Count 1000 (+/-10%) Assessment Type Coursework Assessment Title Meningoencephalitis Algorithm Academic Year 2026 BMS5002 Infectious Diseases Assessment Two Assessment Brief Assessment Information

Assessment Task

This assessment is based upon diagnostic algorithms concerning the diagnosis of meningoencephalitis. This is supported by the lecture content provided within the module. Further support and information will be provided in the workshop and lab sessions. This assessment is based on case studies of meningoencephalitis. Each group will be given their own case study. Any deviation from the correct case study will result in a non-submission. CAREFULLY read the case report and write a report addressing the points provided, using the algorithm and Table provided.

You should write up to 1000 words +/- 10%. Assignments must be written using the Cadmus platform in Moodle. No other formats will be allowed. Cadmus contains a fully functioning editor that is very similar to using Microsoft Word. Avoid copying and pasting material into Cadmus from other programs, as this will be highlighted to the markers. Instead, write everything in your own words directly into Cadmus. You may include figures, tables and/or diagrams. In workshops, you will be shown how to use Cadmus to write your assignment. When writing your assignment, do not include the information provided in the case scenario that you have been sent, as you will use up your word limit.

Completion of this assessment will address the following learning outcomes:

Explain how the different systems within the body function to prevent infections occurring and how pathogens have evolved strategies to overcome the body’s defences. Summarise the key clinical tests for identifying a range of microbes and the associated therapeutic strategies. Submission Information    Present any written aspects of the assessment using font size 11 and using 1.5 spacing to allow for comments and annotations to be added by the markers.    Complete the appropriate cover sheet for this assessment and append your work.      This assessment will be marked anonymously and should show your student number only.      Submit this coursework assessment task via Moodle-

Meningoencephalitis Algorithm

Table 1: Expected CSF Findings in Bacterial versus Viral versus Fungal Meningitis

Case Study One – Groups 1-3

Using the flowchart and expected CSF findings in Table 1, trace a diagnostic pathway for a 65-year-old patient presenting with acute confusion, fever, and a new-onset seizure. The initial CSF analysis shows it is clear, has lymphocytic pleocytosis [ 265 WBC (cell/µl) ], raised protein (300 mg/dl), and glucose levels were at 65 mg/dL.

Flowchart Deconstruction: 25 marks

Justify the rationale behind the sample type chosen and primary testing (e.g., cell counts / Gram stain) From the flow chart/algorithm, analyse and explain which pathogen(s) may be responsible, and why you have excluded the others. Critically evaluate the test(s) chosen to identify the pathogen.  Initial test results indicated that the pathogen(s) listed from the algorithm and what you thought may have caused the infection are not correct. Additional information states that the patient has just come from a holiday in South America (Brazil), where there is an unusually high population of  Ae.egypti  and Culex spp.

Critically explain what pathogens could be responsible but are not listed in the algorithm, and where you would add these pathogens within the algorithm. What diagnostic tests would you recommend and why? 25 marks Algorithm Improvement Proposal: 20 Marks

Based on recent advances in diagnostic technology (e.g., multiplex PCR panels, metagenomic next-generation sequencing), propose a specific modification to the algorithm. Where would you incorporate the new technology? Justify your proposal by discussing how it would improve diagnostic speed, accuracy and cost-effectiveness

Pathogenicity of the disease:

Discuss and explain the viral tropism and pathophysiology of HSV encephalitic infection  20 marks References, Grammar, Scientific terminology: 10 Marks Case Study Two – Groups 4-6

Using the flowchart and expected CSF findings in table 1, trace a diagnostic pathway for a 29-year-old patient presenting symptoms such as neck pain, fever, nausea, photophobia and personality change. Complete blood work illustrated anaemia,  lymphopenia without leukopenia, and serology indicated HIV infection with viremia and decreased CD4 count (<20 cells/uL). CSF and blood were taken. CSF was clear, WBC was 462 (cell/µl), protein was 230 mg/dl, and glucose levels were at 45 mg/dL.

Flowchart Deconstruction: 25 Marks

Justify the rationale behind which algorithm was used. The sample type chosen, as well as primary testing (e.g., cell counts / Gram stain) From the flow chart/algorithm, analyse and explain which pathogen(s) may be responsible, and why you have excluded the others. Critically evaluate the test(s) chosen to identify the pathogen. Initial test results indicated that the pathogen (s) listed from the algorithm and what you thought may have caused the infection are not correct. However, the suspected organism is not a virus; blood cultures grew a fungus, and further information indicated IV drug

Critically explain what pathogen(s) could be responsible but are not listed in the algorithm,  and where you would add these pathogens within the algorithm. What diagnostic tests would you recommend and why; 25 Marks Algorithm Improvement Proposal: 20 Marks

Based on recent advances in diagnostic technology (e.g., multiplex PCR panels, metagenomic next-generation sequencing), propose a specific modification to the algorithm. Where would you incorporate the new technology? Justify your proposal by discussing how it would improve diagnostic speed, accuracy and cost-effectiveness Pathogenicity of the disease 20 Marks

Discuss and explain the infection and pathophysiology of Cryptococcus neoformans CNS infection  References, Grammar, Scientific terminology: 10 Marks Marking Criteria

This assessment addresses the following learning outcomes (LOs):

Explain how the different systems within the body function to prevent infections occurring and how pathogens have evolved strategies to overcome the body’s defences Summarise the key clinical tests for identifying a range of microbes and the associated therapeutic strategies

MGTM04 Corporate Governance and Financial Management Assignment 2 Brief

LEVEL:	LEVEL 7	Submission date:	16th May 2025
Words count:	4000	Outcomes Assessed:	All module learning outcomes, knowledge, and skills are assessed in this assignment.

This assessment is in two parts, please answer all elements.

The assignment carries a weighting of 100% and students should write 4000 words (+10%). It is recommended that this section of the assignment be completed using Microsoft Word.

Submission.

The submission date for the assignment is 288h of May 2025. The assignment must be submitted ONLINE through TURNITIN© by the due date. Only assessments submitted through TURNITIN© will be marked. Any other submission including submission to the library in hard copy will be treated as a non-submission.

There will one Turnitin submission boxes for Part A and Part B respectively.

Please note that this is an individual assignment and the policy of the University on “Policy on Cheating, Collusion and Plagiarism” applies.

THE FRONT COVER OF YOUR ASSIGNMENT MUST SHOW: 

1. Your name.
2. Your student registration number.
3.  Your Programme of Study (e.g., MSc Finance and Management)
4. The word count for Part A&B (excluding the reference list, bibliography, and any appendices).
5. The name of your MGTM04 module leader/ Tutor and your programme leader.

Notes and Guidance of MGTM04:

To obtain a high mark, you should

1. Make your report concise, precise and well-presented and structured.
2. Draw logical conclusions from accounting information.
3. Synthesize information in a coherent and useful way.
4. Show evidence of key text and background reading.
5. Incorporate your knowledge into an integrated piece of work.
6. Demonstrate critical understanding of financial management.

A Harvard standard referencing is required for this assignment.

MGTM04 Part A:

Requirements

1)  Blockchains represent a novel application of cryptography and information technology to age-old problems of financial record keeping, and they may lead to far reaching changes in corporate Governance. Many major players in the financial industry have begun to invest in this new technology, and stock exchanges have proposed using blockchains as a new method for trading corporate equities and tracking their ownership.

Required:

Create a report where you will evaluate the benefits for companies of having good Corporate Governance and how Blockchain technology can improve and reduce Corporate Governance issues due to principal-agent problem, particularly accounting fraud.

In this section students should demonstrate understanding, knowledge, and an ability to critically evaluate the differing theoretical viewpoints associated with the topic. The response should attempt to incorporate a critical perspective through relevant academic referencing, rather than overly describing the topic. Attempting to evaluate within a practical, real-life business context through investigation of academic empirical findings will assist in developing the response.

MGTM04 Part B

Synopsis 

It has been three months since your promotion to assistant financial manager at fashion company RR Ltd. RR Ltd is a fashion retailer listed on the AIM market. The firm was founded 10 years ago, after a short and successful period as a partnership between Rebecca and Roy Race. The company has grown rapidly and has two successful own brand labels, ‘RR’ catering for the middle-income woman’s market and ‘Racey’ aimed at younger women.

RR  Ltd distributes its two major seasonal lines (spring/summer and autumn/winter) under the ‘RR’ label and its young women’s label ‘Racey’ through major high street retailers in the UK and United States. Sales are also generated through exhibits of new collections at clothing exhibitions and through a fledgling, but not dynamic online presence, and very occasional webcast fashion shows.

MGTM04 Task 1

RR    Ltd has recently established a private pension scheme for its employees and the financial manager has asked you to provide a short report on why diversification generally leads to a reduction in risk relative to return. This report will be made available on the company website to inform employees on how the pension scheme manages both risk and return when selecting investable assets (including reference to forms of risk, covariance, perfect positive correlation, perfect negative correlation and CAPM Beta). You will need to create a London Stock Exchange portfolio of shares worth £1m using London Stock Exchange simulator and include screenshots of the London Stock Exchange portfolio as well as analysis charts to explain how a pension fund can minimise risk through diversification and support your arguments.

In this section students should demonstrate understanding, knowledge, and an ability to critically evaluate the differing theoretical viewpoints associated with the topic. The response should attempt to incorporate a critical perspective through relevant academic referencing, rather than overly describing the topic. Attempting to evaluate within a practical, real-life business context through investigation of academic empirical findings will assist in developing the response.

MGTM04 Task 2

Currently, the management at RR Ltd are in preliminary decisions on a horizontal acquisition of ‘Sporty PLC’. Sporty PLC has an established men’s fashion brand; however, it is seen as a ‘Problem Child’ evidenced by relatively low market share in an industry segment that is experiencing growth. Industry analysts believe declining sales is principally due to not anticipating current tastes/trends and the financial manager has approached you for information on what value to place on Sporty PLC.

If the acquisition takes place, Sporty PLC will operate as a separate entity within RR Ltd. Existing designers at

RR    Ltd are very knowledgeable on the female market and believe they can transfer these skills to men’s fashion. Also, Roy Race is an ex-professional footballer and is passionate about men’s sport/casual wear. Both Rebecca and Roy are confident that synergies will improve economies of scale and scope, quality and in the medium-term, key performance ratios for Sporty PLC will be comparable to RR Ltd. RR Ltd’s share price is currently £9.00, and the company’s earnings per share stand at 30p. RR Ltd’s weighted average cost of capital is 10%.

The board estimates that annual after-synergy benefits resulting from the takeover will be £6m, that Sporty’s distributable earnings will grow at an annual rate of 5% and that duplication will allow the sale of £20m of assets, net of corporate tax (currently standing at 30%), in a year’s time. Information relating to Sporty PLC:

	Financial Position Statement of Sporty PLC.
		£m
Non-Current Assets	40
Current Assets		78
	118
Equity:
Ordinary Shares (£1)	40
Reserves			3
	43
Long-Term Debt	10
Current Liabilities		65
Total Liabilities	118

	Statement of Profit or Loss Extracts
	£m
Profit before interest and tax	10
Interest payments		4
Profit before tax	6
Taxation		1.8
Distributable Earnings		4.2
Other Information:
Current ex-dividend share price	£2
Latest dividend payment	11p
Past four years’ dividend payment	8p, 9p, 10p, 10.5p
Sporty’s Equity Beta	1.20
Treasury bill yield	6%
Return of the market	10%

Required:

1)   Given the information above, calculate the value of Sporty PLC using the following valuation methods:

1. a)    Price / Earnings Ratio. (using RR Ltd’s P/E ratio)
   b)    Dividend valuation method.
   c)    Discounted cash flow method.

Based on your calculations, justify the value of Sporty PL and whether the company should ahead with the merger or not. In your answer, you need to focus on financial and non-financial motives for this acquisition.

In this section students should demonstrate understanding, knowledge, and an ability to critically evaluate the differing theoretical viewpoints associated with the topic. The response should attempt to incorporate a critical perspective through relevant academic referencing, rather than overly describing the topic. Attempting to evaluate within a practical, real-life business context through investigation of academic empirical findings will assist in developing the response.

MGTM04 Task 3:

Designs for RR Ltd’s fashion lines are created inhouse and manufacturing takes place across numerous locations in Birmingham, however the company is keen to expand into Asian-Pacific markets and is considering a small manufacturing base in Vietnam.

The project will have an initial outlay of £1m and a 0.2 probability of producing a return of £700,000 in Year 1 and a 0.8 probability of delivering a return of £600,000 in Year 1. If the £700,000 result occurs, then the second year could return either £600,000 (probability of 0.5) or £300,000 (probability of 0.5). If the £600,000 result for Year 1 occurs, then either £700,000 (probability 0.8) or £400,000 (probability 0.2) could be received in the second year. All cash flows occur on anniversary dates. The discount rate is 14%

Required:

1. Calculate:
2. The expected NPV.
3. The standard deviation of NPV.
4. The probability of the NPV being less than zero assuming a normal distribution of return
   – (bell shaped and symmetrical about the mean).

Note: These calculations should be included in the main body of your assignment answer.

2. Based on your analysis of the macroeconomic risk factors, you believe that if the project was delayed by a year, RR Ltd would be able to improve the accuracy of the Year 1 probability estimates, which could lead to a reduced initial outlay and discount rate. Please redo the calculation in part (1) based on this new information and include them and the answers within Appendix 1.

Upon finishing both sets of your calculations, a colleague states that the ‘traditional NPV method is just as effective as an NPV method incorporating probabilities and real option perspectives’. Critically evaluate this statement.

In this section students should demonstrate understanding, knowledge, and an ability to critically evaluate the differing theoretical viewpoints associated with the topic. The response should attempt to incorporate a critical perspective through relevant academic referencing, rather than overly describing the topic. Attempting to evaluate within a practical, real-life business context through investigation of academic empirical findings will assist in developing the response.

MGTM04 Corporate Governance and Financial Management Assignment 2 Brief

LEVEL:	LEVEL 7	Submission date:	16th May 2025
Words count:	4000	Outcomes Assessed:	All module learning outcomes, knowledge, and skills are assessed in this assignment.

This assessment is in two parts, please answer all elements.

The assignment carries a weighting of 100% and students should write 4000 words (+10%). It is recommended that this section of the assignment be completed using Microsoft Word.

Submission.

The submission date for the assignment is 288h of May 2025. The assignment must be submitted ONLINE through TURNITIN© by the due date. Only assessments submitted through TURNITIN© will be marked. Any other submission including submission to the library in hard copy will be treated as a non-submission.

There will one Turnitin submission boxes for Part A and Part B respectively.

Please note that this is an individual assignment and the policy of the University on “Policy on Cheating, Collusion and Plagiarism” applies.

THE FRONT COVER OF YOUR ASSIGNMENT MUST SHOW: 

1. Your name.
2. Your student registration number.
3.  Your Programme of Study (e.g., MSc Finance and Management)
4. The word count for Part A&B (excluding the reference list, bibliography, and any appendices).
5. The name of your MGTM04 module leader/ Tutor and your programme leader.

Notes and Guidance of MGTM04:

To obtain a high mark, you should

1. Make your report concise, precise and well-presented and structured.
2. Draw logical conclusions from accounting information.
3. Synthesize information in a coherent and useful way.
4. Show evidence of key text and background reading.
5. Incorporate your knowledge into an integrated piece of work.
6. Demonstrate critical understanding of financial management.

A Harvard standard referencing is required for this assignment.

MGTM04 Part A:

Requirements

1)  Blockchains represent a novel application of cryptography and information technology to age-old problems of financial record keeping, and they may lead to far reaching changes in corporate Governance. Many major players in the financial industry have begun to invest in this new technology, and stock exchanges have proposed using blockchains as a new method for trading corporate equities and tracking their ownership.

Required:

Create a report where you will evaluate the benefits for companies of having good Corporate Governance and how Blockchain technology can improve and reduce Corporate Governance issues due to principal-agent problem, particularly accounting fraud.

In this section students should demonstrate understanding, knowledge, and an ability to critically evaluate the differing theoretical viewpoints associated with the topic. The response should attempt to incorporate a critical perspective through relevant academic referencing, rather than overly describing the topic. Attempting to evaluate within a practical, real-life business context through investigation of academic empirical findings will assist in developing the response.

MGTM04 Part B

Synopsis 

It has been three months since your promotion to assistant financial manager at fashion company RR Ltd. RR Ltd is a fashion retailer listed on the AIM market. The firm was founded 10 years ago, after a short and successful period as a partnership between Rebecca and Roy Race. The company has grown rapidly and has two successful own brand labels, ‘RR’ catering for the middle-income woman’s market and ‘Racey’ aimed at younger women.

RR  Ltd distributes its two major seasonal lines (spring/summer and autumn/winter) under the ‘RR’ label and its young women’s label ‘Racey’ through major high street retailers in the UK and United States. Sales are also generated through exhibits of new collections at clothing exhibitions and through a fledgling, but not dynamic online presence, and very occasional webcast fashion shows.

MGTM04 Task 1

RR    Ltd has recently established a private pension scheme for its employees and the financial manager has asked you to provide a short report on why diversification generally leads to a reduction in risk relative to return. This report will be made available on the company website to inform employees on how the pension scheme manages both risk and return when selecting investable assets (including reference to forms of risk, covariance, perfect positive correlation, perfect negative correlation and CAPM Beta). You will need to create a London Stock Exchange portfolio of shares worth £1m using London Stock Exchange simulator and include screenshots of the London Stock Exchange portfolio as well as analysis charts to explain how a pension fund can minimise risk through diversification and support your arguments.

In this section students should demonstrate understanding, knowledge, and an ability to critically evaluate the differing theoretical viewpoints associated with the topic. The response should attempt to incorporate a critical perspective through relevant academic referencing, rather than overly describing the topic. Attempting to evaluate within a practical, real-life business context through investigation of academic empirical findings will assist in developing the response.

MGTM04 Task 2

Currently, the management at RR Ltd are in preliminary decisions on a horizontal acquisition of ‘Sporty PLC’. Sporty PLC has an established men’s fashion brand; however, it is seen as a ‘Problem Child’ evidenced by relatively low market share in an industry segment that is experiencing growth. Industry analysts believe declining sales is principally due to not anticipating current tastes/trends and the financial manager has approached you for information on what value to place on Sporty PLC.

If the acquisition takes place, Sporty PLC will operate as a separate entity within RR Ltd. Existing designers at

RR    Ltd are very knowledgeable on the female market and believe they can transfer these skills to men’s fashion. Also, Roy Race is an ex-professional footballer and is passionate about men’s sport/casual wear. Both Rebecca and Roy are confident that synergies will improve economies of scale and scope, quality and in the medium-term, key performance ratios for Sporty PLC will be comparable to RR Ltd. RR Ltd’s share price is currently £9.00, and the company’s earnings per share stand at 30p. RR Ltd’s weighted average cost of capital is 10%.

The board estimates that annual after-synergy benefits resulting from the takeover will be £6m, that Sporty’s distributable earnings will grow at an annual rate of 5% and that duplication will allow the sale of £20m of assets, net of corporate tax (currently standing at 30%), in a year’s time. Information relating to Sporty PLC:

	Financial Position Statement of Sporty PLC.
		£m
Non-Current Assets	40
Current Assets		78
	118
Equity:
Ordinary Shares (£1)	40
Reserves			3
	43
Long-Term Debt	10
Current Liabilities		65
Total Liabilities	118

	Statement of Profit or Loss Extracts
	£m
Profit before interest and tax	10
Interest payments		4
Profit before tax	6
Taxation		1.8
Distributable Earnings		4.2
Other Information:
Current ex-dividend share price	£2
Latest dividend payment	11p
Past four years’ dividend payment	8p, 9p, 10p, 10.5p
Sporty’s Equity Beta	1.20
Treasury bill yield	6%
Return of the market	10%

Required:

1)   Given the information above, calculate the value of Sporty PLC using the following valuation methods:

1. a)    Price / Earnings Ratio. (using RR Ltd’s P/E ratio)
   b)    Dividend valuation method.
   c)    Discounted cash flow method.

Based on your calculations, justify the value of Sporty PL and whether the company should ahead with the merger or not. In your answer, you need to focus on financial and non-financial motives for this acquisition.

In this section students should demonstrate understanding, knowledge, and an ability to critically evaluate the differing theoretical viewpoints associated with the topic. The response should attempt to incorporate a critical perspective through relevant academic referencing, rather than overly describing the topic. Attempting to evaluate within a practical, real-life business context through investigation of academic empirical findings will assist in developing the response.

MGTM04 Task 3:

Designs for RR Ltd’s fashion lines are created inhouse and manufacturing takes place across numerous locations in Birmingham, however the company is keen to expand into Asian-Pacific markets and is considering a small manufacturing base in Vietnam.

The project will have an initial outlay of £1m and a 0.2 probability of producing a return of £700,000 in Year 1 and a 0.8 probability of delivering a return of £600,000 in Year 1. If the £700,000 result occurs, then the second year could return either £600,000 (probability of 0.5) or £300,000 (probability of 0.5). If the £600,000 result for Year 1 occurs, then either £700,000 (probability 0.8) or £400,000 (probability 0.2) could be received in the second year. All cash flows occur on anniversary dates. The discount rate is 14%

Required:

1. Calculate:
2. The expected NPV.
3. The standard deviation of NPV.
4. The probability of the NPV being less than zero assuming a normal distribution of return
   – (bell shaped and symmetrical about the mean).

Note: These calculations should be included in the main body of your assignment answer.

2. Based on your analysis of the macroeconomic risk factors, you believe that if the project was delayed by a year, RR Ltd would be able to improve the accuracy of the Year 1 probability estimates, which could lead to a reduced initial outlay and discount rate. Please redo the calculation in part (1) based on this new information and include them and the answers within Appendix 1.

Upon finishing both sets of your calculations, a colleague states that the ‘traditional NPV method is just as effective as an NPV method incorporating probabilities and real option perspectives’. Critically evaluate this statement.

In this section students should demonstrate understanding, knowledge, and an ability to critically evaluate the differing theoretical viewpoints associated with the topic. The response should attempt to incorporate a critical perspective through relevant academic referencing, rather than overly describing the topic. Attempting to evaluate within a practical, real-life business context through investigation of academic empirical findings will assist in developing the response.