After reviewing the material provided on TOGAF and enterprise architecture, consider if you have everything necessary for the proposed project. Review the materials found in the Week 4: Enterprise ArchitectureLinks to an external site. reading list as needed.

For example, does the current architecture of the IT infrastructure within the company allow for ease of integration? Do you have the appropriate personnel to work on the project? Does a budget exist for the project? Can security standards be met? Can users be trained properly? What other IT systems need to be included as part of your proposal?

Review your proposal that you created for your IT Proposal project. Using TOGAF, address how can you strengthen the project proposal to ensure that both the business and technology stakeholder needs are met?

This assignment has two deliverables: a paper and the revised presentation. You will use elements from these deliverables in your final project to submit a coordinated communication package for your project.

Part 1: Paper Prepare a 3–5 page paper in which you do the following:

Identify the components of the TOGAF that are going to be included in your proposal. Explain your rationale for including these other components from the TOGAF. Analyze the impact TOGAF components have on the effectiveness of business processes. Describe potential challenges from you expect these additional components to add to your proposal. Plan strategies for overcoming these challenges. Evaluate how the TOGAF model helps align business goals with an IT solution. Part 2: Revised Presentation Add a slide to your PowerPoint presentation from last week’s assignment that succinctly identifies:

The components TOGAF included in your proposal. Your plan for integrating the associated IT and business components into the proposed solution. Submit both of your files in the assignment area, and attach the PowerPoint presentation that has been revised to also include TOGAF components to be considered.

Additional Requirements Written communication: Written communication is free of errors that detract from the overall message. APA formatting: Resources and citations are formatted according to current APA style. Use Academic WriterLinks to an external site. for guidance in citing sources and formatting your paper in proper APA style. See the Writing CenterLinks to an external site. for more APA resources specific to your degree level. Number of resources: Minimum of two resources. Visit the Undergraduate Information Technology Library GuideLinks to an external site. for help finding resources in the Capella library. Length of paper: 3–5 double-spaced pages. Paper font and font size: Arial 10-point or Times New Roman 12-point. Length of presentation: 4–6 slides. Competencies Measured By successfully completing this assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and rubric criteria:

Competency 1: Examine business goals to determine benefits from information technology and information systems. Evaluate how the TOGAF model helps align business goals with an IT solution. Competency 3: Plan a strategy for designing and employing an information system to meet business goals. Plan strategies for overcoming potential challenges in employing TOGAF components in an information system to meet business goals. Competency 4: Analyze enterprise architectures and the impact they have on the effectiveness of business processes. Analyze the impact TOGAF components have on the effectiveness of business processes. Competency 7: Communicate effectively using professional standards appropriate to the IT field. Follow APA guidelines for resources and citations, and create a document that is clearly and professionally written and generally free of grammatical errors

Research paper
Due Monday by 11:59pm
Points 30
Submitting an external tool
Available until May 4 at 11:59pm
After you had your topic and sources approved you can write the paper.
Research Paper
Assignment: your task is to write a five-page research paper in which to explore your topic of interest. This essay should showcase your talents as a writer.
Criteria for evaluation:
When I evaluate your essay, I will be paying special attention to the aspects of the essay listed below. You should think about the criteria as you are writing |
your paper, and you should check the criteria after you have written a draft to see how well your essay meets each of the evaluation criteria.
• relevant choice of topic
• clear purpose and justification of topic
• efficient introduction of the topic
• background information
• coherent argument
• effectively addressing opposing views
• minimum of five sources
• original thinking
• use of sources – processing information
• correct citation |
• style (the attitude you convey, word choice, no wordiness, the use of clichés,,,)
• mechanics (spelling, grammar, complete sentences, correct punctuation…) “A,” ‘B,” and “C” essays contain almost no errors. Significant or numerous
errors are a characteristic of a “D” or “F” essay. (Detailed requirements for each grade on the syllabus).
Al-generated content is not the student’s work. Students must always acknowledge and document any use of Al. To represent Al-generated text as their
own is academic dishonesty and will be treated as such according to the Fayetteville State University Code of Student Conduct.
Please be aware of the Al policy on the course syllabus:
You will not get credit for Al generated text.

The purpose of this discussion is to examine disease processes associated with a client scenario following the instructions below. The course faculty will reveal the disease process at the end of the week.

Step 1: Carefully read the following client scenario:

Wilbur, a 55-year-old male client, presents to the NP complaining of a flat, purple-colored rash on his back and chest. Wilbur states the rash is not painful or itchy. He states it has been there for months, and he has also developed a white coating on his tongue and has “been sick a lot lately.”

Step 2: Identify your assigned disease process from the chart below. Your assigned disease process is based on the first letter of your last name.

Last NameDisease Process

A – HCondition: Allergies

I – PCondition: Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)

Q – ZCondition: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE)

Step 3: Answer the discussion prompts below with explanation and detail, providing complete references for all citations.

Step 4: Reply to a peer with a different assigned condition.

Include the following sections:

1. Application of Course Knowledge: Answer all questions/criteria with explanations and detail.

Discuss the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms of your assigned disease process. Which clinical manifestations observed in Wilbur’s case may be explained by the pathophysiological mechanisms?
Analyze Wilbur’s clinical manifestations as they relate to your assigned disease process. Do these findings support your assigned disease process? Why or why not?
Identify and justify the diagnostic tests (including labs, imaging, or other diagnostic tests) that may be most appropriate for investigating your assigned disease process as the diagnosis for Wilbur. Discuss anticipated test results.
Compare and contrast your response with a peer assigned to a different condition. Does their condition fit Wilbur’s case? Why or why not? Explain your rationale.
2. Integration of Evidence: Integrate relevant scholarly sources as defined by program expectations:

Cite a scholarly source in the initial post.
Cite a scholarly source in one faculty response post.
Cite a scholarly source in one peer post.
Accurately analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles from evidence with no more than one short quote (15 words or less) for the week.
Include a minimum of two different scholarly sources per week. Cite all references and provide references for all citations.

Submit your Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate primary diagnosis.
Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:

Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5-TR criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this client if you could conduct the session over? Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

IBUS3005 International Business in Emerging Markets Assessment 2 2026 | Newcastle

IBUS3005 Assessment 2: Group Project (30%)

• Each student is required to work in a group, submit a group report (2000 words +/- 10%), and present their group work (10 minutes).
• The group report is due on Sunday of Week 12 by 11:59 pm, and group presentations will be done in Week 10 and Week 11.

Assessment Purpose

The purpose of the assessment task is to gain experience working in teams and facilitate learning on emerging markets in the rapidly evolving international business environment. Students will work in teams to prepare a report detailing the internationalization process and recommendations for the emerging market strategy.

Assessment Structure, Requirements, Guidelines, And Rubric

• Use the learning from the course.
• Use the report format below. The included recommended word count is approximate.

Section 1. Introduce the Selected International Organization (100 words) = Discuss the international organization your team has selected for the assessment, primarily focusing on advising the reader on (a) why it is essential to study the selected international organization, and (b) why study it now, concerning emerging markets?

Section 2. Discuss the Context (300 words) = Provide a brief overview of the organization, such as its size, profits, number of staff, head office, worldwide office locations, key products and services, and general business characteristics of the industry/sector that your selected international organization operates in.

Section 3. Select and Critically Analyse an Emerging Market (500 words) = Utilize the course content covered from Week 1 to Week 10 to select and critically analyse an emerging market that you recommend that the selected international organization should consider for internationalization and/or business expansion.

Section 4. Recommend an Emerging Market Strategy (1000 words) = Incorporating the recent events in the international business environment especially those concerning the home country of the selected international organization and the emerging market that you have chosen (in Section 3) for further consideration, recommend an emerging market strategy to either revise a specific existing emerging market strategy or propose a new one.

Section 5. Summary and Conclusion (100 words) = Provide a summary of your findings to conclude the report.

Section 6. Presentation (10 minutes) = Present your work.

Section 7. References (Note: This section is not counted towards the word limit)

Section 8. Appendices (If any: Note: This section is not counted towards the word limit)

MG5606 Global Business and Investments Assignment/Coursework Brief for 2026 | Brunel University

MG5606 Global Business and Investments Assignment/Coursework Brief for 2026

Assessment Title:	Coursework
Module Leader:	Dr. Hemamali Tennakoon
Distribution Date:	28th January 2026
Submission Deadline:	12:00 noon on 30th April 2026
Feedback by :	20 working days after the submission the deadline
Contribution to overall module assessment:	100%
Indicative student time working on assessment:	42 hours in total equivalent to 5.5 full-time working days
Word or Page Limit (if applicable):	2,500 words, excluding references, cover page, table of contents, and appendices
Assessment Type (individual or group):	Individual

Main Objective of the assessment

This assignment invites you to critically examine the diverse impacts of globalisation on both developed and developing countries. You will explore how globalisation shapes economic, social, and political landscapes, and assess the role of international financial institutions in influencing global trade, investment, and monetary systems.

By completing this assignment, you will:

• Analyse the differential impacts of globalisation on national economies and societies.
• Assess the roles and influence of global institutions such as the IMF, World Bank, and WTO.
• Develop a nuanced understanding of the interplay between global forces and national policy responses.

Description of the Assessment

Write a 2,500 words [excluding references, cover page, table of contents, and appendices] analytical essay that addresses the following:

Part A: Comparative Impact of Globalisation (Approx. 2,000 words)

1.Select two countries: one developed (e.g., Germany, Japan, USA) and one developing (e.g., India, Nigeria, Brazil).

2.Analyse how globalisation has affected each country in terms of:

• Economic transformation (e.g., trade, investment, industrialisation, labour markets)
• Social change (e.g., inequality, migration, cultural exchange)
• Political implications (e.g., policy autonomy, governance, civil society)

3.Compare and contrast the experiences of the two countries, highlighting:

• Key similarities and differences
• Factors that explain divergent outcomes (e.g., institutional capacity, historical context, policy choices)

Part B: Reflection and Policy Implications (Approx. 500 words)

1.  Propose two policy recommendations for national governments or international institutions to mitigate the negative effects of globalisation.

Further Guidelines

The essay should be 2500 words (this word limit does not include title page, executive summary, table of contents, references or appendices but everything Else), word processed: 1.5 space; 12 font; Times Roman; 1 inch square margin. References should be in 11 font and single spaced. All appendix material should also be 11 font and single spaced.

Criteria	Weighting
Critical Analysis: Depth of insight into the economic, social, and political impacts of globalisation.	30%
Comparative Evaluation: Effectiveness in comparing and contrasting the two countries’ experiences.	25%
Use of Evidence: Integration of academic sources, data, and real-world examples.	20%
Policy Insight: Relevance and feasibility of proposed policy recommendations.	15%
Structure and Presentation: Clarity, coherence, academic writing style, and referencing.	10%

PG mark bands and grade point bands [Senate Regulation 3] are:

Indicative Mark Band	Degree class equivalent	Grade Point
90 and above	A*	17
80-89	A+	16
73-79	A	15
70-72	A-	14
68-69	B+	13
63-67	B	12
60-62	B-	11
58-59	C+	10
53-57	C	9
50-52	C-	8
48-49	D+	7
43-47	D	6
40-42	D-	5
38-39	E+	4
33-37	E	3
30-32	E-	2
29 and below	F	1

Submission Instructions

Coursework must be submitted electronically via WISEflow. The required file format for this report is Adobe PDF. Your student ID number must be used as the file name (e.g. 0123456.pdf). You must ensure that you upload your file in the correct format and complete the coversheet before submitting your assignment.
Please note that submissions of ‘.pages / .docx etc’ documents will not be accepted and must be converted to approved format.

BUS7B48 HRM In Context Assessment Brief 2 2026 | Wrexham

BUS7B48 HRM In Context Assessment Brief 2

Module Outcomes Assessed

• Discuss, evaluate, and critically reflect on the national and/or international market and competitive environments of organisations, and explain how organisational leaders interact with and respond to HR practitioners at operational and strategic levels.
• Critically evaluate how organisational and HR strategies are shaped and developed in response to internal and external environmental (STEEPLED/global and competitive) factors
• Analyse the future trends that will change the way organisations operate, and critically discuss how these trends will impact strategically on the business environment within which HR professionals work.

Assessment Task Details

Select an organisation of your choice and write a report addressing the following:

a) Provide a brief introduction of the organisation and evaluate the national and/or international market and competitive environment in which the organisation operates.

b) Critically evaluate how organisational and HR strategies are shaped and developed in response to internal and external environmental factors, using a STEEPLED (Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Political, Legal, Ethical, Demographic)

c) Identify and analyse future trends (e.g., AI, automation, remote work, ESG, demographic shifts, globalisation, DEI priorities, etc.) likely to change how organisations operate.

d) Critically discuss the strategic implications of these trends for the business environment in which HR professionals work.

Submission instructions – What should be the format of the submission? / Where should it be submitted?

The assignment should be submitted in the form of a written essay, in Microsoft Word or equivalent format, via Turnitin on Moodle.

Hints and Tips

Assessment Template

• This is an individual assignment.
• The written assignment should be in essay format, and structured in paragraphs, with an opening paragraph, paragraphs to aid discussion, and finally a closing paragraph.
• Paragraph headings should be relevant to the context of the assignment.
• References – all published sources cited in the report must be referenced in alphabetical order, in line with Harvard referencing.  These should be in alphabetical order.
• Appendices – this is where you should include all supporting information that you have used to support your analysis and discussion.  They could include tables, graphs, questionnaires, surveys or transcripts.  Please remember to refer to any appendices in your report.

Additional Guidance:

All submitted work is expected to observe academic standards in terms of referencing, academic writing, use of language, etc. Failure to adhere to these instructions may result in your work being awarded a lower grade than it would otherwise deserve.

LD7209 Financial Technologies for Market Modelling and Analysis Assessment Brief 2026 | Northumbria University Newcastle

LD7209 Financial Technologies for Market Modelling and Analysis Assessment Brief

Submission of Assessment

Electronic Management of Assessment (EMA): Please note that if your assignment is submitted electronically, it will be submitted online via Turnitin by the given deadline. You will find a Turnitin link on the module’s eLP site.

It is your responsibility to ensure that your assignment arrives before the submission deadline stated above. See the University policy on late submission of work.

Please note that assignments are subject to anonymous marking.

Instructions on Assessment:

This module is assessed by an individual assignment (3000 words) weighted at 100%.

You have been asked to critically investigate a financial sector materially transformed by technology. Your analysis should be in the form of a recommendation to the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of a financial firm.

The purpose of the evaluation and recommendation is to convey your opinion on the business and Technology Strategy within a particular financial sector of your choice.

You are free to choose a financial sector of your own choice from the following (Choose one of them and provide a brief introduction supported with accredited sources).

• Lending
• Payments
• Asset management
• Insurance
• Risk management
• Or Capital markets

Your analysis must include Market analysis, Characteristics of the organisation, Opportunities, and Risks within the financial sector, supported with relevant data from accredited academic sources.

Please write a report to demonstrate critical analysis and an understanding of Fintech developments within your chosen financial sector. Include a critical discussion on how technology, data analytics, and customer access may be providing opportunities and products you made a recommendation to the CEO of the financial firm.

Provide relevant recommendations based on the analysis.

You will provide evidence of developed artefacts in the appendices.

Mapping to Programme Goals and Objectives

Knowledge & Understanding:

1. Demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of the FinTech landscape and critical awareness of the changes that influence the functioning of the financial industry and banking regulatory requirements, particularly with the emergence of FinTech companies.

2. Critically review, consolidate, and extend a systematic and coherent knowledge of existing banking regulations, theoretical discourses, methodologies or practices at the forefront of FinTech innovation and transformation within the financial services industry.

3. Develop critical thinking perspectives on the FinTech revolution with a focus on the role played by digital platforms.

Professional Skills & Abilities:

4. Autonomously implement and evaluate appropriate advanced business models in FinTech, drawing on and recognising differentiator factors.

Personal Values Attributes (Global / Cultural awareness, Ethics, Curiosity) (PVA):

5. Apply new and novel methods to undertake a critical analysis and evaluation of concepts relating to transformations, best practices in digital industries and how firms in financial services are embracing the new rules of competition.

Assessment Regulations

You are advised to read the guidance for students regarding assessment policies. They are available online here.

Academic Misconduct

The Assessment Regulations for Taught Awards (ARTA) contain the Regulations and procedures applying to cheating, plagiarism, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems, and other forms of academic misconduct.

The full policy is available here

You are reminded that plagiarism, collusion, the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Systems, and other forms of academic misconduct, as referred to in the Academic Misconduct procedure of the assessment regulations, are taken very seriously. Assignments in which evidence of plagiarism or other forms of academic misconduct is found may receive a mark of zero.

Late submission of work

Where coursework is submitted without approval, after the published hand-in deadline, the following penalties will apply. For coursework submitted up to 1 working day (24 hours) after the published hand-in deadline without approval, 10% of the total marks available for the assessment (i.e.100%) shall be deducted from the assessment mark.

For clarity: a late piece of work that would have scored 65%, 55% or 45% had it been handed in on time will be awarded 55%, 45% or 35% respectively, as 10% of the total available marks will have been deducted.

The Penalty does not apply to Pass/Fail Modules, i.e. there will be no penalty for late submission if assessments on Pass/Fail are submitted up to 1 working day (24 hours) after the published hand-in deadline.

Coursework submitted more than 1 day (24 hours) after the published hand-in deadline without approval will be marked as zero but will be eligible for referral. The reassessment should where appropriate, and as determined by the Module Leader, be the same method (e.g. essay) but maybe with a different task (e.g. different essay title) or with the same task (e.g. the same essay title) as indicated in the Module handbook.

In modules where there is more than one assessment component, Students are not required to complete all assessment components if an overall Pass Mark (40% UG, 50% PGT) has been achieved.

The only permitted exception will be in cases where the University is prevented from doing so by a PSRB requirement. In the case of PSRB requirements, a variation order will be required from the regulations.

In modules, where there is more than one assessment component and an overall pass mark has not been achieved, Students will be eligible for a referral* in the individual failed module and/or not attempted component(s) of assessment.

These provisions apply to all assessments, including those assessed on a Pass/Fail basis.

The full policy can be found here

Word limits

The word count is to be declared on the front page of your assignment and the assignment cover sheet. The word count does not include:

****PLEASE CONFIRM WHAT THE WORD COUNT DOES NOT INCLUDE**** e.g. appendices, glossary, footnotes, tables

Please note in text citations [e.g. (Smith, 2011)] and direct secondary quotations [e.g. “dib-dab nonsense analysis” (Smith, 2011, p.123)] are INCLUDED in the word count.

If this word count is falsified, students are reminded that under ARTA, this will be regarded as academic misconduct.

For those assessments where students are required to keep to the word limit, it is proposed that they should be informed that the marker will stop reading at the point when they judge that the word limit exceeds the recommended word count by more than 10%. The marker will indicate the point at which they stop reading the text.

Students must retain an electronic copy of this assignment (including ALL appendices), and it must be made available within 24hours of them requesting it to be submitted.

The full Word Limit Policy is available here

********Time limits and penalties for presentations DELETE IF NO PRESENTATION

The time allocated for the presentation must be adhered to. At the end of this time, the presentation will be stopped and will be marked based on what has been delivered within the time limit.

As funeral homes go, Van Patton’s was the finest.  It was four, proud generations of funeral heritage and had a reputation of “service to all, no matter what your means.”  It was rumored that the Van Patton family were descendants of Johannes Vermeer and that two of his paintings hung rather sublimely in the entrance foyer.  Ditmar Van Patton, IV, volunteered and sat on the board of the town’s privately-owned children’s nursing center, Petits Angus, a long-term and terminal care center specifically for children with fundamental, developmental disabilities.  Van Patton’s took care of almost every child who died within the facility, regardless of payment.

Van Patton’s was called for the death of a 25-year-old female named Lydia.  She suffered from many severe congenital anomalies – among them was Gardener’s Syndrome including supernumerary (hyperdontia) teeth.  Due to her fragility and other conditions, she never had the ability to fully close her mouth.  Van Patton’s embalmer, Jack Hystek, was highly experienced but never dealt with a peculiarity like this.  Visitations at the funeral home, that involved patients from Petits Angus, were always huge with the entire staff coming to the service.  This was a night call and he was off the next morning.  Rather than chance, his work backing up, he decided to embalm right away.  To close this young lady’s mouth and to set her features properly, Jack would need to remove two upper and lower teeth on each side of the jaw.  This would necessitate pliers and a screwdriver and over an hour’s extra time.  Once complete, although having a pronounced prognathism, the line of the jaw aligned symmetrically and the lips closed perfectly.  Once dressed, cosmetized, and hair complete – she looked wonderful.

Lydia’s father, mother, and younger sister had seen her with her mouth open her entire life.  They never asked about preparation procedures and presumed that when they returned to the funeral home for the visitation and funeral service, her mouth would just be open.  On the other hand, when Ditmar made arrangements, he was unaware of the young lady’s condition, and by the time the family arrived for arrangements, she had already been embalmed.

The family arrived 30 minutes before the visitation for some private time.  They thanked Ditmar for the donation of the funeral.  The family did not have the means to pay and much of Lydia’s care came from public assistance.  Upon entering the chapel, their initial reaction was one of relief – she looked wonderful.  The family asked the visitation attendant to set up some photo boards and asked where the lounge and restrooms were located.  After an hour, the mother was curious and asked to speak with Ditmar.  She was curious as to how they managed to close Lydia’s mouth because she was aware that medically, it was impossible.  “Certainly, you wouldn’t do anything to our little girl, would you?”  inquired the mother as her eyes welled up with tears.  Ditmar, uncertain about any of this, needed to speak with Jack and said he would return with an explanation.  “Perhaps the jaw relaxed in death which allowed it to properly align.”  The family retreated to the chapel, but Ditmar could hear the family saying that “they wanted an autopsy.”  Visitors at the wake instinctively knew something was wrong and found it curious that Lydia’s mouth was closed.  The rumor-mill was an embarrassment to the entire family.

Nervously, Ditmar inquired with Jack and found out about the procedure.  The teeth that were removed had been disposed.  Ditmar had the unenviable task of reporting to the family that Lydia’s teeth had been surgically removed in order to accommodate the closing of her mouth.  As much as he tried to sugar coat it and avoided any mention of the procedure, he maintained that the jaw relaxed after death allowing a more natural closure.  The family wasn’t buying it and was mortified at the prospect of having her teeth “knocked out.”

After about an hour, the family, distraught by all of the talk, left during the visitation.  The burial was postponed and the family retained an attorney.  An independent autopsy revealed the extent of the procedure.  There were teeth and bone fragments in the throat of the deceased as well as lacerations on her tongue, buccal tissue, and gums, as well as chipped teeth.

The family is outraged and is suing the funeral home for mutilation of a dead human body, negligent embalming, unauthorized removal of tissues, unauthorized procedures performed on a dead human body, wrongful withholding of a dead human body, unnecessary destruction of remains, and invasion of rights including invasion of confidentiality.  Among their claims are mental anguish and extreme emotional distress.

Ditmar argues that the funeral was free and that the procedures were necessary because the family elected to have a visitation with a public viewing.  It would be patently wrong to have a visitation where the public would be subjected to a gaping corpse.  After all, Van Patton’s has a reputation of uphold.

ISSUE

The issue is “does the removal of teeth from a deceased, by an embalmer, without permission, act as mutilation of a dead human body?”

QUESTIONS

1.     What is the likely outcome of each count of the complaint?

2.     Did the plaintiff’s attorney miss any other counts?

3.     Since there was no charge for the service, is the funeral home in the clear?

4.     If the opportunity should present itself for Van Patton’s Funeral Home, should it attempt to settle the case?

Task

Investigate attacks on anonymising networks 

This assessment aims to assess the understanding of anonymising networks using The Onion Router (TOR) and analyse the network traffic using available tools. This assessment task will also assess the following learning outcome of this subject as well as measure progress towards all the learning outcomes:

• be able to investigate the usage of anonymising networks in the dark web using publicly available tools

Description:                                                                                                                                  

You are required to prepare an anonymising network analysis report using the Tor browser based on the following scenario:

As a security specialist for a company, you’re responsible for detecting potential dangers and vulnerabilities early on, such as data breaches and other cyber incidents that could harm your company’s brand. You work as a security expert with an agency, ensuring that the organisation’s data is safe from cyber-attacks. You receive an unexpected alert from your web server at work, indicating that unusual or suspicious behaviour is occurring. As part of your organisation’s security procedures and policies, you gather network traffic logs utilising accessible anonymising network technologies to examine the source of the suspicious behaviour.

You will examine the network traffic logs from both the conventional network and the Tor Network using available analysis tools, as well as all other security compliance procedures, to determine the source of an entry that appeared to be suspicious or malicious.

Your task:

1. You will access your network traffic logs (please make sure that you are not breaching your privacy if it is your workplace logs)
2. Your task is to surf the web safely and anonymously using the Tor network through the Tor browser. The best way to keep yourself private is to combine Tor with a VPN. You will be required to describe how you maintained your safety while exploring the web.
3. Navigate the web to discover if there is any suspicious activity.
4. Analyse the captured traffic and identify any abnormal/suspicious activity.
5. In your report, you must include the following –
   • describe the navigated web traffic logs for your traffic analysis;
   • provide some screenshots as evidence of your log analysis ;
   • and explain the differences between normal routing traffic from Tor routing traffic;
   • explain how Tor maintains anonymity during web browsing;
   • describe the potential challenges of the Tor network concerning traffic analysis.

This assessment also provides an opportunity for you to :

– demonstrate factual knowledge, understanding and application of state-of-art of anonymising network;

– demonstrate the ability to investigate the usage of anonymising networks in the dark web

– apply understanding and knowledge to a practical situation.

Note. 

Exploration of the dark web conditions: you may stumble upon the content you do not want to see, as part of the safety practices when exploring the Dark Web, it is expected that you stick to the purpose of this assessment task and look solely for sites relevant to the threat intelligence. In line with CSU’s duty of care, you will be required to capture how you used the safety protocols in your final report.

Rationale

x

This assessment task will assess the following learning outcome/s:

• be able to analyse the malicious and cybercriminal activities inside the dark web.
• be able to analyse dark web content and create web logs.
• be able to investigate the usage of anonymising networks in the dark web using publically available tools.

Presentation

x

Presentation

• Your answers to the questions should be precise but complete and informative.
• Your submission must be in a form readable by Microsoft Word or PDF/Acrobat format and submit it via EASTS.
• The report should be precise but complete and informative and the number of words within 800-1000 words.
• Your submission must be no more than 8 pages long (including diagrams), must have margins no less than 2cm, and a font size no less than 12 points.
• Any text adapted from any source must be clearly labelled and referenced.  Please refer to the CSU referencing guide http://student.csu.edu.au/study/referencing-at-csu.

Marking criteria and standards

x

The following standards will be used to mark this assessment :

 

 

Assessable Components	HD	DI	CR	PS
Access and collection of network traffic, summarize the report with potential challenges of traffic analysis, including steps to safeguard yourself while exploring the Dark Web.   Maximum marks: 20	Comprehensive summary of the report is provided which is consistent with the task. Report provides logical statements that explicitly illustrates how access and collection of dark web traffic was achieved. The potential challenges to traffic analysis was explained in full. Safety protocols captured in report. Report language is appropriate to the assessment with accurate referencing using APA 7th edition.	Detailed report summary that is consistent with the task. Provides a accurate and detailed overview of the results, threats and vulnerabilities including a explicit reference to challenges faced in analysing network traffic. Safety protocols captured in report. Report language is appropriate to assessment with accurate referencing using APA 7th edition.	Good summary of results reflecting the assessment purpose. Provides a general overview of the results, threats and vulnerabilities, including an outline of challenges faced in analysing network traffic. Safety protocols captured in the report. Report language appropriate to assessment with proper referencing.	Satisfies the minimum requirements. Provided basic description of access and collection of dark web traffic and summarised the challenges faced in analysing net work traffic. Safety protocols captured in the report. Summary report contains referencing.

 

Requirements

x

For this assessment, you are required to use APA referencing to acknowledge the sources that you have used in preparing your assessment. Please refer to the CSU referencing guide http://student.csu.edu.au/study/referencing-at-csu. In addition, a very useful tool for you to use that demonstrates how to correctly use in-text referencing and the correct way to cite the reference in your reference list can be found at https://apps.csu.edu.au/reftool/apa-7