To Prepare

· Refer to the “Population-Focused Nurse Practitioner Competencies” in the Learning Resources, and consider the quality measures or indicators advanced practice nurses must possess in your specialty.

· Refer to your “Clinical Skills Self-Assessment Form” you submitted in Week 1 and consider your strengths and opportunities for improvement.

· Refer to your Patient Log in Meditrek; consider the patient activities you have experienced in your practicum experience and reflect on your observations and experiences.

In 450–500 words, address the following:

Learning From Experiences

· Revisit the goals and objectives from your Practicum Experience Plan. Explain the degree to which you achieved each during the practicum experience.

· Reflect on the 3 most challenging patients you encountered during the practicum experience. What was most challenging about each?

· What did you learn from this experience?

· What resources were available?

· What evidence-based practice did you use for the patients?

· What would you do differently?

· How are you managing patient flow and volume? How can you apply your growing skillset to be a social change agent within your community?

Communicating and Feedback

· Reflect on how you might improve your skills and knowledge and how to communicate those efforts to your Preceptor.

· Answer these questions: How am I doing? What is missing?

· Reflect on the formal and informal feedback you received from your Preceptor.

By Day 7

Submit your Journal.

submission information

Before submitting your final assignment, you can check your draft for authenticity. To check your draft, access the Turnitin Drafts from the Start Here area.

1. To submit your completed assignment, save your Assignment as WK11Assgn_LastName_Firstinitial

2. Then, click on Start Assignment near the top of the page.

3. Next, click on Upload File and select Submit Assignment for review.

Submit your Comprehensive Psychiatric Evaluation, including your differential diagnosis and critical-thinking process to formulate primary diagnosis.
Incorporate the following into your responses in the template:

Subjective: What details did the patient provide regarding their chief complaint and symptomology to derive your differential diagnosis? What is the duration and severity of their symptoms? How are their symptoms impacting their functioning in life?
Objective: What observations did you make during the psychiatric assessment?
Assessment: Discuss the patient’s mental status examination results. What were your differential diagnoses? Provide a minimum of three possible diagnoses with supporting evidence, listed in order from highest priority to lowest priority. Compare the DSM-5-TR diagnostic criteria for each differential diagnosis and explain what DSM-5-TR criteria rules out the differential diagnosis to find an accurate diagnosis. Explain the critical-thinking process that led you to the primary diagnosis you selected. Include pertinent positives and pertinent negatives for the specific patient case.
Reflection notes: What would you do differently with this client if you could conduct the session over? Also include in your reflection a discussion related to legal/ethical considerations (demonstrate critical thinking beyond confidentiality and consent for treatment!), health promotion and disease prevention taking into consideration patient factors (such as age, ethnic group, etc.), PMH, and other risk factors (e.g., socioeconomic, cultural background, etc.).

IBUS3005 International Business in Emerging Markets Assessment 2 2026 | Newcastle

IBUS3005 Assessment 2: Group Project (30%)

• Each student is required to work in a group, submit a group report (2000 words +/- 10%), and present their group work (10 minutes).
• The group report is due on Sunday of Week 12 by 11:59 pm, and group presentations will be done in Week 10 and Week 11.

Assessment Purpose

The purpose of the assessment task is to gain experience working in teams and facilitate learning on emerging markets in the rapidly evolving international business environment. Students will work in teams to prepare a report detailing the internationalization process and recommendations for the emerging market strategy.

Assessment Structure, Requirements, Guidelines, And Rubric

• Use the learning from the course.
• Use the report format below. The included recommended word count is approximate.

Section 1. Introduce the Selected International Organization (100 words) = Discuss the international organization your team has selected for the assessment, primarily focusing on advising the reader on (a) why it is essential to study the selected international organization, and (b) why study it now, concerning emerging markets?

Section 2. Discuss the Context (300 words) = Provide a brief overview of the organization, such as its size, profits, number of staff, head office, worldwide office locations, key products and services, and general business characteristics of the industry/sector that your selected international organization operates in.

Section 3. Select and Critically Analyse an Emerging Market (500 words) = Utilize the course content covered from Week 1 to Week 10 to select and critically analyse an emerging market that you recommend that the selected international organization should consider for internationalization and/or business expansion.

Section 4. Recommend an Emerging Market Strategy (1000 words) = Incorporating the recent events in the international business environment especially those concerning the home country of the selected international organization and the emerging market that you have chosen (in Section 3) for further consideration, recommend an emerging market strategy to either revise a specific existing emerging market strategy or propose a new one.

Section 5. Summary and Conclusion (100 words) = Provide a summary of your findings to conclude the report.

Section 6. Presentation (10 minutes) = Present your work.

Section 7. References (Note: This section is not counted towards the word limit)

Section 8. Appendices (If any: Note: This section is not counted towards the word limit)

MG5606 Global Business and Investments

MG5606 Global Business and Investments Assignment/Coursework Brief for 2026

Assessment Title:	Coursework
Module Leader:	Dr. Hemamali Tennakoon
Distribution Date:	28th January 2026
Submission Deadline:	12:00 noon on 30th April 2026
Feedback by :	20 working days after the submission the deadline
Contribution to overall module assessment:	100%
Indicative student time working on assessment:	42 hours in total equivalent to 5.5 full-time working days
Word or Page Limit (if applicable):	2,500 words, excluding references, cover page, table of contents, and appendices
Assessment Type (individual or group):	Individual

Main Objective of the assessment

This assignment invites you to critically examine the diverse impacts of globalisation on both developed and developing countries. You will explore how globalisation shapes economic, social, and political landscapes, and assess the role of international financial institutions in influencing global trade, investment, and monetary systems.

By completing this assignment, you will:

• Analyse the differential impacts of globalisation on national economies and societies.
• Assess the roles and influence of global institutions such as the IMF, World Bank, and WTO.
• Develop a nuanced understanding of the interplay between global forces and national policy responses.

Description of the Assessment

Write a 2,500 words [excluding references, cover page, table of contents, and appendices] analytical essay that addresses the following:

Part A: Comparative Impact of Globalisation (Approx. 2,000 words)

1.Select two countries: one developed (e.g., Germany, Japan, USA) and one developing (e.g., India, Nigeria, Brazil).

2.Analyse how globalisation has affected each country in terms of:

• Economic transformation (e.g., trade, investment, industrialisation, labour markets)
• Social change (e.g., inequality, migration, cultural exchange)
• Political implications (e.g., policy autonomy, governance, civil society)

3.Compare and contrast the experiences of the two countries, highlighting:

• Key similarities and differences
• Factors that explain divergent outcomes (e.g., institutional capacity, historical context, policy choices)

Part B: Reflection and Policy Implications (Approx. 500 words)

1.  Propose two policy recommendations for national governments or international institutions to mitigate the negative effects of globalisation.

Further Guidelines

The essay should be 2500 words (this word limit does not include title page, executive summary, table of contents, references or appendices but everything Else), word processed: 1.5 space; 12 font; Times Roman; 1 inch square margin. References should be in 11 font and single spaced. All appendix material should also be 11 font and single spaced.

Criteria	Weighting
Critical Analysis: Depth of insight into the economic, social, and political impacts of globalisation.	30%
Comparative Evaluation: Effectiveness in comparing and contrasting the two countries’ experiences.	25%
Use of Evidence: Integration of academic sources, data, and real-world examples.	20%
Policy Insight: Relevance and feasibility of proposed policy recommendations.	15%
Structure and Presentation: Clarity, coherence, academic writing style, and referencing.	10%

PG mark bands and grade point bands [Senate Regulation 3] are:

BUS7B48 HRM In Context Assessment Brief 2 2026 | Wrexham

BUS7B48 HRM In Context Assessment Brief 2

Module Outcomes Assessed

• Discuss, evaluate, and critically reflect on the national and/or international market and competitive environments of organisations, and explain how organisational leaders interact with and respond to HR practitioners at operational and strategic levels.
• Critically evaluate how organisational and HR strategies are shaped and developed in response to internal and external environmental (STEEPLED/global and competitive) factors
• Analyse the future trends that will change the way organisations operate, and critically discuss how these trends will impact strategically on the business environment within which HR professionals work.

Assessment Task Details

Select an organisation of your choice and write a report addressing the following:

a) Provide a brief introduction of the organisation and evaluate the national and/or international market and competitive environment in which the organisation operates.

b) Critically evaluate how organisational and HR strategies are shaped and developed in response to internal and external environmental factors, using a STEEPLED (Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Political, Legal, Ethical, Demographic)

c) Identify and analyse future trends (e.g., AI, automation, remote work, ESG, demographic shifts, globalisation, DEI priorities, etc.) likely to change how organisations operate.

d) Critically discuss the strategic implications of these trends for the business environment in which HR professionals work.

Submission instructions – What should be the format of the submission? / Where should it be submitted?

The assignment should be submitted in the form of a written essay, in Microsoft Word or equivalent format, via Turnitin on Moodle.

Hints and Tips

Assessment Template

• This is an individual assignment.
• The written assignment should be in essay format, and structured in paragraphs, with an opening paragraph, paragraphs to aid discussion, and finally a closing paragraph.
• Paragraph headings should be relevant to the context of the assignment.
• References – all published sources cited in the report must be referenced in alphabetical order, in line with Harvard referencing.  These should be in alphabetical order.
• Appendices – this is where you should include all supporting information that you have used to support your analysis and discussion.  They could include tables, graphs, questionnaires, surveys or transcripts.  Please remember to refer to any appendices in your report.

Additional Guidance:

All submitted work is expected to observe academic standards in terms of referencing, academic writing, use of language, etc. Failure to adhere to these instructions may result in your work being awarded a lower grade than it would otherwise deserve.

BUS7B48 HRM In Context Assessment Brief 2 2026 | Wrexham

BUS7B48 HRM In Context Assessment Brief 2

Module Outcomes Assessed

• Discuss, evaluate, and critically reflect on the national and/or international market and competitive environments of organisations, and explain how organisational leaders interact with and respond to HR practitioners at operational and strategic levels.
• Critically evaluate how organisational and HR strategies are shaped and developed in response to internal and external environmental (STEEPLED/global and competitive) factors
• Analyse the future trends that will change the way organisations operate, and critically discuss how these trends will impact strategically on the business environment within which HR professionals work.

Assessment Task Details

Select an organisation of your choice and write a report addressing the following:

a) Provide a brief introduction of the organisation and evaluate the national and/or international market and competitive environment in which the organisation operates.

b) Critically evaluate how organisational and HR strategies are shaped and developed in response to internal and external environmental factors, using a STEEPLED (Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Political, Legal, Ethical, Demographic)

c) Identify and analyse future trends (e.g., AI, automation, remote work, ESG, demographic shifts, globalisation, DEI priorities, etc.) likely to change how organisations operate.

d) Critically discuss the strategic implications of these trends for the business environment in which HR professionals work.

Submission instructions – What should be the format of the submission? / Where should it be submitted?

The assignment should be submitted in the form of a written essay, in Microsoft Word or equivalent format, via Turnitin on Moodle.

Hints and Tips

Assessment Template

• This is an individual assignment.
• The written assignment should be in essay format, and structured in paragraphs, with an opening paragraph, paragraphs to aid discussion, and finally a closing paragraph.
• Paragraph headings should be relevant to the context of the assignment.
• References – all published sources cited in the report must be referenced in alphabetical order, in line with Harvard referencing.  These should be in alphabetical order.
• Appendices – this is where you should include all supporting information that you have used to support your analysis and discussion.  They could include tables, graphs, questionnaires, surveys or transcripts.  Please remember to refer to any appendices in your report.

Additional Guidance:

All submitted work is expected to observe academic standards in terms of referencing, academic writing, use of language, etc. Failure to adhere to these instructions may result in your work being awarded a lower grade than it would otherwise deserve.

Marking Criteria

 

Marking Criteria	Marks
Provide a brief introduction of the organisation and evaluate the national and/or international market and competitive environment in which the organisation operates.	20
Critically evaluate how organisational and HR strategies are shaped and developed in response to internal and external environmental factors, using a STEEPLED (Social, Technological, Economic, Environmental, Political, Legal, Ethical, Demographic)	25
Identify and analyse future trends (e.g., AI, automation, remote work, ESG, demographic shifts, globalisation, DEI priorities, etc.) likely to change how organisations operate.	20
Critically discuss the strategic implications of these trends for the business environment in which HR professionals work.	20
Conclusion (summary of the report)	15

 

 

%	Level 7 Generic Marking Criteria
Distinction
90-100	Outstanding: Outstanding systematic understanding of knowledge and critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights, informed by the forefront of the academic discipline, field of study or area of professional practice. The work demonstrates an outstanding knowledge of techniques applicable to research and advanced scholarship. Application of knowledge is original, with outstanding practical understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in the subject discipline. Work demonstrates outstanding critical evaluation of current research, advanced scholarship, and methodologies, and, where appropriate, proposes new hypotheses. There is evidence of outstanding systematic and creative management of complex issues to make sound judgments in the absence of complete data. Outstanding communication of conclusions to specialist and non-specialist audiences. Outstanding self-direction and originality in tackling and solving problems with evidence of an outstanding ability to advance personal knowledge and understanding and to develop new skills at a high level. An outstanding display of the qualities and transferable skills needed for employment that require initiative and personal responsibility, complex decision-making and independent learning for continued professional development.
80-90	Exceptional: In most areas, the qualities required for the grade above are displayed, though there may be negligible errors.
70-79	Excellent: In most areas, the qualities required for the grade above are displayed. There may be negligible errors and some minor inaccuracies/omissions.
Pass
60-69	Very Good: Very good systematic understanding of knowledge and critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights, informed by the forefront of the academic discipline, field of study or area of professional practice. The work demonstrates a very good knowledge of techniques applicable to research and advanced scholarship. Application of knowledge is original, with very good practical understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in the subject discipline. Work evidences very good critical evaluation of current research, advanced scholarship and methodologies to propose new hypotheses if appropriate. There is evidence of very good systematic and creative management of complex issues to make sound judgments in the absence of complete data. Very good communication of conclusions to specialist and non-specialist audiences. Very good self-direction and originality in tackling and solving problems with evidence of a very good ability to advance personal knowledge and understanding and to develop new skills at a high level. A very good display of the qualities and transferable skills needed for employment that require initiative and personal responsibility, complex decision-making and independent learning for continued professional development.
50-59	Fairly Good: Fairly good systematic understanding of knowledge and critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights, informed by the forefront of the academic discipline, field of study or area of professional practice. The work demonstrates a fairly good knowledge of techniques applicable to research and advanced scholarship. Application of knowledge is original, with a fairly good practical understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in the subject discipline. Work evidences a fairly good critical evaluation of current research, advanced scholarship and methodologies to propose new hypotheses if appropriate. There is evidence of fairly good systematic and creative management of complex issues to make sound judgments in the absence of complete data. Fairly good communication of conclusions to specialist and non-specialist audiences. Fairly good self-direction and originality in tackling and solving problems with evidence of a fairly good ability to advance personal knowledge and understanding and to develop new skills at a high level. A fairly good display of the qualities and transferable skills needed for employment that require initiative and personal responsibility, complex decision-making and independent learning for continued professional development.
40-49	Satisfactory: Satisfactory systematic understanding of knowledge and critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights, informed by the forefront of the academic discipline, field of study or area of professional practice. The work demonstrates a satisfactory knowledge of techniques applicable to research and advanced scholarship. Application of knowledge is original with satisfactory practical understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in the subject discipline. Work evidences satisfactory critical evaluation of current research, advanced scholarship and methodologies to propose new hypotheses if appropriate. There is evidence of satisfactory systematic and creative management of complex issues to make sound judgments in the absence of complete data. Satisfactory communication of conclusions to specialist and non-specialist audiences. Satisfactory self-direction and originality in tackling and solving problems with evidence of a satisfactory ability to advance personal knowledge and understanding and to develop new skills at a high level. A satisfactory display of the qualities and transferable skills needed for employment that require initiative and personal responsibility, complex decision-making and independent learning for continued professional development.
35-39	Marginal Refer/Fail: Some systematic understanding of knowledge and critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights, informed by the forefront of the academic discipline, field of study or area of professional practice. The work demonstrates some knowledge of techniques applicable to research and advanced scholarship. Application of knowledge is original, with some practical understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in the subject discipline. Work evidences limited critical evaluation of current research, advanced scholarship and methodologies to propose new hypotheses if appropriate. There is some evidence of systematic and creative management of complex issues to make sound judgments in the absence of complete data. Limited communication of conclusions to specialist and non-specialist audiences. Some self-direction and originality in tackling and solving problems with evidence of a limited ability to advance personal knowledge and understanding, and to develop new skills at a high level. A limited display of the qualities and transferable skills needed for employment that require initiative and personal responsibility, complex decision-making and independent learning for continued professional development. (Compensation is possible within the regulations of the board for undergraduate & postgraduate levels).
30-34	Refer/Fail: Minimal systematic understanding of knowledge and critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights, informed by the forefront of the academic discipline, field of study or area of professional practice. The work demonstrates minimal knowledge of techniques applicable to research and advanced scholarship. Application of knowledge is original, with minimal practical understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in the subject discipline. Work evidences minimal critical evaluation of current research, advanced scholarship and methodologies to propose new hypotheses if appropriate. Evidence of systematic and creative management of complex issues to make sound judgments in the absence of complete data is lacking. Limited communication of conclusions to specialist and non-specialist audiences. Minimal self-direction and originality in tackling and solving problems with evidence of a limited ability to advance personal knowledge and understanding and to develop new skills at a high level. Minimal display of the qualities and transferable skills needed for employment that require initiative and personal responsibility, complex decision-making and independent learning for continued professional development.
1-29	Clear Refer/Fail: Unsatisfactory systematic understanding of knowledge and critical awareness of current problems and/or new insights, informed by the forefront of the academic discipline, field of study or area of professional practice. The work lacks knowledge of techniques applicable to research and advanced scholarship. Application of knowledge is unoriginal without a practical understanding of how established techniques of research and enquiry are used to create and interpret knowledge in the subject discipline. Work lacks critical evaluation of current research, advanced scholarship and methodologies to propose new hypotheses if appropriate. Evidence of systematic and creative management of complex issues to make sound judgments in the absence of complete data is insufficient. Poor communication of conclusions to specialist and non-specialist audiences. Inadequate self-direction and originality in tackling and solving problems, with little to no ability to advance personal knowledge and understanding and to develop new skills at a high level. Work does not display the qualities and transferable skills needed for employment that require initiative and personal responsibility, complex decision-making and independent learning for continued professional development.

ASSESSMENT GUIDE

ITC708 Business Process Modeling and Management

Semester 1, 2026

Victorian Institute of Technology | www.vit.edu.au

Assessment Overview

Note: * denotes ‘Hurdle Assessment Item’ that students must achieve at least 40% in this item to pass the unit.

 

Assessment ID	Assessment Item	When due	Weighting	ULO#	CLO# for BITS
1	Analysis Report (Individual) (1500 words)	Session 4	25%	2	1,2,3
2	Project Proposal (Group) (2000 Words)	Session 9	35%	2, 3	1,2,3,4
3*	Project Report (Group) (2000 Words)	Session 12	30%	1,2,3,4,5	1,2,3,4,5
	Presentation (Group)	Session 13 (Study Week)	10%

 

Referencing Guides

You must reference all the sources of information you have used in your assessments. Please use the IEEE referencing style when referencing in your assessments in this unit. Refer to the library’s referencing guides for more information.

• https://elearning.vit.edu.au/pluginfile.php/473840/block_html/content/VIT%20Library%20Referencing%20-%20IEEE%20-%2007042020.pdf

Academic Misconduct

VIT enforces that the integrity of its students’ academic studies follows an acceptable level of excellence. VIT will adhere to its VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms where it explains the importance of staff and student honesty in relation to academic work. It outlines the kinds of behaviors that are ‘academic misconduct’, including plagiarism.

Late Submissions

In cases where there are no accepted mitigating circumstances as determined through VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms, late submission of assessments will lead automatically to the imposition of a penalty. Penalties will be applied as soon as the deadline is reached.

Short Extensions and Special Consideration

Special Consideration is a request for:

• Extensions of the due date for an assessment, other than an examination (e.g. assignment extension).
• Special Consideration in relation to a Completed assessment, including an end-of-unit Examination.

Students wishing to request Special Consideration in relation to an assessment the due date of which has not yet passed must engage in written emails to the teaching team to Request for Special Consideration as early as possible and prior to start time of the assessment due date, along with any accompanying documents, such as medical certificates.

For more information, visit VIT Policies, Procedures and Forms.

Inclusive and Equitable Assessment

Reasonable adjustment in assessment methods will be made to accommodate students with a documented disability or impairment. Contact the unit teaching team for more information.

Contract Cheating

Contract cheating usually involves purchasing an assignment or piece of research from another party. This may be facilitated by a fellow student or friend or purchased on a website. The unauthorized use of generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) is also considered cheating. Other forms of contract cheating include paying another person to sit an exam in the student’s place.

Contract Cheating Warning:

• By paying someone else to complete your academic work, you don’t learn as much as possible if you did the work yourself.
• You are not prepared for the demands of your future employment.
• You could be found guilty of academic misconduct.
• Many pay-for-contract cheating companies recycle assignments despite guarantees of ‘original, plagiarism-free work’, so the similarity is easily detected by Turnitin.
• Penalties for academic misconduct include suspension and exclusion.
• Students in some disciplines are required to disclose any findings of guilt for academic misconduct before being accepted into certain professions (e.g., law).
• You might disclose your personal and financial information unsafely, leaving yourself open to many risks, including possible identity theft.
• You also leave yourself open to blackmail – if you pay someone else to do an assignment, they know you have engaged in fraudulent behaviour and can always blackmail you.

Grades

We determine your grades to the following Grading Scheme:

 

 

Grade	Percentage
A	80% – 100%
B	70% – 79%
C	60% – 69%
D	50% – 59%
F	0% – 49%

 

Assessment Details for Assessment Item 1: Business Process Modeling for Process Improvement

Objective:

The objective of this assignment is for students to demonstrate their comprehensive understanding of Business Process Modeling (BPM) by analyzing and assessing a complex business situation, operations, and processes. The assignment focuses on identifying efficiency issues within an organization and proposing process improvements using modern approaches and technologies relevant to the situation.

Scenario:

You are a consultant hired by a large financial services company, FinTech Solutions Ltd. (FSL), which offers a wide range of banking and financial products. FSL has been experiencing challenges related to operational efficiency, customer service delays, and redundant processes. Your task is to conduct a thorough analysis of FSL’s current business processes, identify areas for improvement, and propose solutions using BPM techniques and modern technologies.

Task Description:

1. Understanding the Current Business Processes:

• Analyze the existing business processes at FSL, including operational workflows, customer interactions, data handling, and decision-making processes.
• Identify specific inefficiencies, bottlenecks, or areas where improvements can be made to enhance efficiency and customer satisfaction.

2. Process Improvement Recommendations:

• Propose specific process improvements using BPM methodologies such as process mapping, process redesign, automation, and optimization techniques.
• Justify your recommendations with clear arguments based on potential benefits, feasibility, and alignment with FSL’s strategic goals.

3. Application of Modern Approaches and Technologies:

• Discuss modern approaches and technologies (e.g., robotic process automation, AI-driven analytics, cloud computing) that can be applied to address the identified efficiency issues.
• Explain how these technologies can optimize operations, reduce costs, and improve overall business performance at FSL.

Report Structure (Total: 25 Marks):

Your report (1500 Words) should be structured as follows:

1. Introduction (3 marks):

• Provide an overview of FSL and its current challenges related to operational efficiency and process management.
• Outline the purpose and objectives of the report, including the scope of the analysis and proposed improvements.

2. Analysis of Current Business Processes (6 marks):

• Detailed analysis of FSL’s existing business processes, highlighting inefficiencies and areas for improvement.
• Use BPM tools and techniques to map out and analyse the identified processes.

3. Process Improvement Recommendations (10 marks):

• Propose specific process improvements for FSL, focusing on areas identified in the analysis phase.
• Justify each recommendation with considerations of feasibility, potential benefits, and alignment with FSL’s strategic objectives.

4. Application of Modern Approaches and Technologies (4 marks):

• Discuss relevant modern approaches and technologies that can be applied to enhance FSL’s operational efficiency.
• Explain how these technologies contribute to process optimization and improved business outcomes.

5. Conclusion (1 mark):

• Summarize the key findings and recommendations from your analysis.
• Emphasize the potential impact of implementing the proposed process improvements and technologies at FSL.

6. References (1 mark):

• List all sources cited in the report, formatted according to academic or professional standards (e.g., IEEE, APA).

Submission Guidelines:

• Format: Submit a well-structured report (approximately 1200-1500 words) in a professional format suitable for business analysis.
• Language: Use clear and concise language, avoiding unnecessary technical jargon.
• Sources: Ensure all information is properly cited from credible sources (academic journals, industry reports, reputable websites).

Assessment Criteria:

• Analysis of Business Processes: Depth and accuracy of the analysis conducted on FSL’s business processes and efficiency issues.
• Process Improvement Recommendations: Appropriateness and feasibility of the proposed process improvements, supported by strong justifications.
• Application of Modern Technologies: Relevance and clarity in discussing modern approaches and technologies applicable to improving FSL’s operations.
• Clarity and Presentation: Clarity of writing, organization of ideas, and adherence to report structure.
• Critical Thinking and Insight: Demonstrated ability to apply BPM concepts and modern technologies to real-world business challenges.

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcome Mapping:

 

Assessment Item	When due	Weighting	ULO#	CLO# for BITS
Analysis Report (Individual) (1500 words)	Session 5	25%	2	1,2,3

 

Marking Rubric:

 

Task	Criteria	Marks	Excellent	Good	Satisfactory	Needs Improvement
Introduction	Overview of FSL and its challenges, and outline of the purpose and objectives of the report	3	Provides a comprehensive and clear overview of FSL and its challenges, and clearly outlines the purpose and objectives of the report	Provides a clear overview and outlines purpose and objectives, but lacks some detail	Provides a basic overview and states the purpose and objectives, but lacks clarity and detail	Fails to provide an overview or outline the purpose and objectives clearly
Analysis of Current Business Processes	Detailed analysis of FSL’s existing business processes using BPM tools, highlighting inefficiencies and areas for improvement	6	Provides a thorough and detailed analysis, effectively using BPM tools to map out and analyze processes	Provides a good analysis using BPM tools, but misses some details	Provides a basic analysis with limited detail and effectiveness in using BPM tools	Analysis is superficial or missing, and BPM tools are not used effectively
Process Improvement Recommendations	Specific process improvements for FSL with justification considering feasibility, potential benefits, and alignment with FSL’s strategic objectives	10	Proposes specific and detailed improvements with strong justification, considering feasibility, benefits, and strategic alignment	Proposes specific improvements with good justification, but lacks some depth	Proposes basic improvements with limited relevance and justification	Proposals are vague or irrelevant, with little to no justification
Application of Modern Approaches and Technologies	Discussion of modern approaches and technologies to enhance operational efficiency, and explanation of their contribution to process optimization and business outcomes	4	Thoroughly discusses relevant approaches and technologies, clearly explaining their contribution to optimization and outcomes	Discusses approaches and technologies, but lacks some depth in explaining their contribution	Mentions modern approaches with limited discussion and explanation	Fails to discuss relevant approaches or explain their contribution clearly
Conclusion	Summary of key findings and recommendations, emphasizing the potential impact of proposed improvements and technologies	1	Clearly summarizes key findings and recommendations, emphasizing the potential impact	Summarizes findings and recommendations but lacks some clarity or emphasis on impact	Provides a basic summary with limited emphasis on impact	Does not summarize findings and recommendations or emphasize impact clearly
References	Listing of all sources cited in the report, formatted according to academic or professional standards (not included in marks)	1	Lists all sources correctly formatted	Lists sources but with some formatting errors	Lists sources with significant formatting errors	Fails to list sources or has numerous formatting errors

 

Note: All work is due by the due date and time. Late submissions will be penalized at 20% of the assessment final grade per day, including weekends.

Assessment Details for Assessment Item 2: Project Proposal (Group)

Assignment Overview

This assignment is designed to apply theoretical knowledge to practical scenarios, enhancing your skills in business process analysis and improvement using BPMN. Your proposal should reflect a deep understanding of the selected business situation and provide practical solutions for enhancing process efficiency.

1. Introduction (5 marks)

1.1. Business Situation and Context (2 marks)

Select one of the following detailed business situations and describe its context. Provide specific details about the process issues or challenges being faced:

1. E-commerce Customer Service Optimization

Context: An online retail company is experiencing significant delays in customer service response times. Customers report dissatisfaction due to long wait times and unresolved issues. The current process involves manual tracking of queries through email and phone, leading to inefficiencies and inconsistent service quality. The company aims to enhance response times and overall customer satisfaction.

2. Manufacturing Production Line Efficiency

Context: A mid-sized electronics manufacturer is facing delays and high defect rates on its production line for assembling smart phones. The process includes stages such as assembly, quality control, and packaging. Inefficiencies like machine breakdowns and workflow bottlenecks have led to increased downtime and defective products. The company seeks to streamline the production process and reduce defect rates.

3. Healthcare Patient Scheduling System

Context: A busy urban hospital is struggling with an outdated patient scheduling system, resulting in frequent appointment overlaps and long wait times. The system fails to account for changes in patient schedules or medical staff availability, leading to inefficiencies in patient flow. The hospital aims to modernize its scheduling system to improve patient experience and optimize resource utilization.

4. Retail Inventory Management

Context: A national retail chain is dealing with inventory management issues, including frequent stock outs and overstock situations. The company’s inventory system is not effectively aligned with real-time demand, resulting in lost sales due to stock outs and excess inventory elsewhere. The goal is to enhance inventory accuracy and reduce discrepancies between inventory levels and actual demand.

5. Financial Services Fraud Detection

Context: A major financial institution is facing challenges with detecting fraudulent transactions across its network. The current system relies on outdated algorithms that are ineffective against sophisticated fraud techniques, leading to increased financial losses. The institution aims to upgrade its fraud detection system to better identify and prevent fraudulent activities in real-time.

1.2. Objectives (3 marks)

Clearly state the objectives of your project proposal:

• To access and analyze current approaches and technologies in business process management relevant to the selected business situation.
• To recommend the most suitable analytics methodology for addressing the identified process inefficiencies.
• To develop a BPMN-based data model for diagnosing process issues and recommending improvement strategies.

2. BPMN-Based Research Questions (5 marks)

Develop three BPMN-focused research questions that your proposal will address:

• How can BPMN be applied to model the current process in the chosen business situation to clearly visualize process flow, tasks, and decision points?
• What inefficiencies or bottlenecks can be identified through BPMN modeling, and how can these insights be used to improve the process?
• How can the BPMN diagram be used to propose actionable improvements and enhancements to the business process, ensuring better alignment with desired outcomes?

3. Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) (15 marks)

3.1. Overview of BPMN (3 marks)

Provide an overview of Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN). Explain how BPMN is used to visualize, analyze, and improve business processes. Include a brief description of BPMN’s main elements such as processes, events, gateways, and tasks.

3.2. BPMN Application to Chosen Business Situation (5 marks)

Apply BPMN to your selected business situation. Create a BPMN diagram that models the current process related to the chosen scenario. The diagram should include:

• Process Flow: Visual representation of the sequence of activities in the process.
• Events: Key events that trigger or end processes.
• Gateways: Decision points that affect the process flow.
• Tasks: Activities performed in the process.

3.3. Analysis Using BPMN (5 marks)

Analyze the BPMN diagram to identify inefficiencies or bottlenecks in the current process. Discuss:

• Process Bottlenecks: Areas where delays or inefficiencies occur.
• Inefficient Activities: Tasks that are redundant or could be streamlined.
• Improvement Opportunities: Potential changes that could enhance process efficiency.

3.4. Recommendations for Process Improvement (2 marks)

Based on your BPMN analysis, provide recommendations for improving the process. Suggest specific changes to address identified issues and enhance overall process performance.

4. Practical Issues (5 marks)

4.1. Data Accessibility and Quality (2 marks)

Explain how you will ensure data accessibility and maintain data quality:

• How you will obtain necessary data from relevant stakeholders.
• Methods for ensuring the accuracy and completeness of the data collected.

4.2. Implementation Feasibility (2 marks)

Discuss the feasibility of implementing your proposed solutions:

• Identify the resources needed for implementing the recommendations.
• Outline strategies for engaging stakeholders and securing their support for the changes.

4.3. Evaluation and Measurement (1 mark)

Describe how you will evaluate the success of your recommendations:

• Define Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to measure the impact of the improvements.
• Outline mechanisms for collecting feedback and making iterative adjustments as needed.

5. Expected Outcomes (5 marks)

Describe the expected outcomes of your project:

• A comprehensive assessment of business process management approaches and technologies related to the chosen business situation.
• Recommendations for the most effective analytics methodology.
• A detailed BPMN diagram and analysis for diagnosing process issues and suggesting actionable improvement strategies.

6. Conclusion (5 marks)

Summarize the importance of the project and how your recommendations will address the identified issues. Highlight how your BPMN analysis and proposed solutions will contribute to improving process efficiency and effectiveness.

Submission Instructions:

• Form a group and select one of the detailed business situations.
• Prepare a comprehensive project proposal addressing all sections outlined above.
• Ensure your proposal is well-organized, with a particular focus on BPMN analysis, and provides clear, actionable insights and recommendations.

Assessment Tasks Learning Outcome Mapping:

 

Assessment ID	Assessment Item	When due	Weighting	ULO#	CLO# for BITS
2	Project Proposal (Group) (2000 Words)	Session 9	35%	2, 3	1,2,3,4

 

Marking Rubrics:

 

Task Criteria	Beyond Expectations (5 marks)	Meets Requirements (3-4 marks)	Needs Improvement (1-2 marks)	Does Not Meet Expectations (0 marks)
1. Introduction (5 marks) 1.1. Business Situation and Context	Thorough and detailed description with clear context.	Adequate description with some relevant details.	Partial description; lacks depth or clarity.	Incomplete or unclear description.
1.2. Objectives	Clear, well-defined objectives fully aligned with the business situation.	Objectives are stated but may be somewhat unclear or partially aligned.	Objectives are vague or partially related to the business situation.	Objectives are missing or irrelevant.
2. BPMN-Based Research Questions (5 marks) 2.1. Research Questions	Three insightful and well-formulated BPMN-based questions directly related to the business situation.	Three relevant questions with minor issues in formulation or relevance.	Two relevant questions or three questions with significant issues.	Questions are not clearly related to BPMN or the business situation.
3. BPMN Diagram and Application (10 marks) 3.1. BPMN Overview	Comprehensive overview with clear explanation of BPMN elements and their application.	Basic overview with some details missing or unclear.	Minimal or unclear overview of BPMN.	No overview provided.
3.2. BPMN Diagram	Detailed and accurate BPMN diagram effectively modeling the process.	Mostly accurate BPMN diagram with minor issues in detail.	Diagram is incomplete or has several inaccuracies.	Diagram is largely incorrect or missing.
4. BPMN Analysis (10 marks) 4.1. Analysis of Inefficiencies	Thorough analysis identifying clear inefficiencies, bottlenecks, and improvement opportunities.	Good analysis with minor gaps or inaccuracies in identifying issues.	Adequate analysis with some gaps or inaccuracies.	Minimal or unclear analysis of BPMN diagram.
4.2. Recommendations for Improvement	Clear, actionable recommendations well-supported by BPMN analysis.	Recommendations are somewhat clear but lack detailed support.	Recommendations are unclear or not well supported by BPMN analysis.	No actionable recommendations or not based on BPMN analysis.
5. Practical Issues (5 marks) 5.1. Data Accessibility and Quality	Detailed explanation on ensuring data accessibility and maintaining quality.	Basic explanation with some issues in detail or clarity.	Inadequate or unclear explanation of data accessibility and quality.	No explanation provided.
5.2. Implementation Feasibility	Comprehensive discussion including resources needed and stakeholder engagement.	Some discussion of feasibility but lacks detail or clarity.	Basic discussion with significant gaps or inaccuracies.	Inadequate or missing discussion on feasibility.
6. Evaluation and Measurement (5 marks) 6.1. Evaluation and Measurement	Clear description of success evaluation, KPIs, and feedback mechanisms.	Adequate description with some gaps or lack of detail.	Minimal or unclear description of evaluation and measurement.	No description provided.
7. Conclusion (5 marks) 7.1. Conclusion	Well-articulated conclusion summarizing project significance, BPMN analysis, and recommendations.	Good conclusion with minor issues in clarity or depth.	Adequate conclusion with some gaps or lack of depth.	Minimal or unclear conclusion.

 

Assessment Details for Assessment Item 3: Project Report (Group)

Note: * denotes ‘Hurdle Assessment Item’ that students must achieve at least 40% in this item to pass the unit.

Objective:

To build on the achievements from Assessment 2, your group will deliver a final report and presentation that demonstrates your capability to achieve the project goals set out in your proposal. This report will present a suite of critical findings, strategic advice, and actionable measures for improving business processes. You will also address impacts on organizations and society where relevant. Each group member will complete a peer review report and a self-reflective report as individual submissions.

Assignment Overview:

This assignment will culminate in a comprehensive final report and an oral presentation that encapsulate the findings and recommendations based on the previous assessments. Your work should reflect a practical application of business process analysis using BPMN, demonstrating your ability to enhance process efficiency and address broader organizational impacts.

 

 

Assessment ID	Assessment Item	When due	Weighting	ULO#	CLO# for BITS
3*	Project Report (Group) (2000 Words)	Session 12	30%	1,2,3,4,5	1,2,3,4,5
	Presentation (Group)	Session 13 (Study Week)	10%

 

Deliverables:

• Final Report
• Oral Presentation
• Peer Review Report (Individual)
• Self-Reflective Report (Individual)

1. Final Report:

1.1. Executive Summary

Provide a brief overview of the project, including the selected business situation, main findings, and key recommendations. Ensure that the summary is concise and tailored for executive stakeholders.

1.2. Detailed Business Situation Analysis

• Revisit and elaborate on the business situation described in Assessment 2. Include a thorough analysis of the process issues and challenges, integrating any new data or insights obtained during the project.

1.3. BPMN-Based Analysis

• Present a refined BPMN diagram based on any updates or changes since Assessment 2.
• Analyze the diagram to highlight key inefficiencies, bottlenecks, and opportunities for improvement.
• Provide a detailed discussion of how BPMN modeling has contributed to understanding and addressing the identified issues.

1.4. Strategic Recommendations

• Offer a comprehensive set of recommendations based on your BPMN analysis. Include actionable measures, strategic advice, and specific steps for process improvement.
• Discuss the potential impact of these recommendations on organizational performance and societal implications.

1.5. Implementation and Evaluation Plan

• Outline a plan for implementing the proposed changes, including necessary resources, stakeholder engagement strategies, and risk management considerations.
• Define Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) to measure the success of the implementation and describe how feedback will be collected for iterative improvements.

1.6. References and Appendices

• Include all relevant references, data sources, and appendices that support your report. Ensure proper citation of all materials used.

2. Oral Presentation

2.1. Presentation Content

• Prepare a professional presentation summarizing the key findings, recommendations, and implementation plan from your final report.
• Ensure clarity in presenting complex information and demonstrate a thorough understanding of the business process analysis.

2.2. Delivery and Engagement

Deliver the presentation confidently and professionally. Engage with the audience, handle questions effectively, and demonstrate teamwork in the presentation delivery.

3. Peer Review Report

3.1. Evaluation of Group Members

• Assess the contributions of each group member, including their participation, quality of work, and collaboration throughout the project.
• Provide constructive feedback and justify your evaluations.

3.2. Reflection on Team Dynamics

• Reflect on the team dynamics, communication, and overall effectiveness of the group. Discuss any challenges faced and how they were addressed.

4. Self-Reflective Report

4.1. Personal Contribution

• Describe your individual contributions to the project, including specific tasks you undertook and how your work contributed to the overall success of the project.

4.2. Learning and Development

• Reflect on what you have learned throughout the project. Discuss how the experience has enhanced your skills in business process analysis and BPMN, and how it has prepared you for future professional challenges.

Assessment Criteria:

• Clarity and Depth: Depth of analysis and clarity in presenting findings and recommendations.
• Practical Application: Effectiveness in applying BPMN to real-world business situations.
• Strategic Thinking: Quality and feasibility of strategic recommendations and implementation plans.
• Professionalism: Quality of the final report, presentation delivery, and individual reflections.

Marking Rubrics:

 

Task Criteria	Beyond Expectations (4)	Meets Requirements (3)	Needs Improvement (2)	Does Not Meet Expectations (1)
1.1 Executive Summary (5 marks) Conciseness and clarity	Provides a concise, comprehensive summary tailored for executive stakeholders.	Clear summary of findings and recommendations.	Summary is unclear or incomplete.	Missing, unclear, or ineffective summary.
1.2 Detailed Business Situation Analysis (10 marks) Depth of analysis and integration	Thorough, insightful analysis with comprehensive integration of new data.	Detailed analysis with some integration of new data.	Analysis lacks depth or integration of new data.	Superficial analysis with missing key details.
1.3 BPMN-Based Analysis (15 marks) Diagram detail and analysis	Highly detailed BPMN diagram with insightful analysis of inefficiencies.	Detailed BPMN diagram with clear analysis and recommendations.	Incomplete BPMN diagram or limited analysis.	Missing or unclear BPMN diagram with inadequate analysis.
1.4 Strategic Recommendations (10 marks) Relevance and feasibility of recommendations	Comprehensive, actionable recommendations with clear strategic rationale.	Relevant recommendations with clear rationale.	Recommendations are somewhat relevant but lack detailed rationale.	M

ICT902 Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning

Semester 1 2026

Assessment 2 – Ethical Considerations in AI Solutions – 30% Guide

(Open Assessment)

Submission Deadline: Sunday 19 April 2026 11:59 PM

Total Assessment weighting – 30%

Purpose of this assessment

This assessment aims to develop student’s ability to critically examine ethical issues arising from the development and deployment of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies in real-world contexts. By engaging with a contemporary AI application or scenario, students will apply conceptual knowledge, ethical reasoning frameworks, and analytical thinking to identify potential risks, biases, governance challenges, and societal implications. The task requires students to evaluate the responsible use of AI systems, assess their broader organizational and social impact, and formulate well-reasoned, evidence-based recommendations. Through this process, students will strengthen their capacity for critical reflection, professional judgment, and the production of a structured academic report that demonstrates ethical awareness and responsible AI practice in complex decision-making environments.

Demonstrate achievement of this learning outcome:

ULO 4: Explore and critically assess the ethical considerations surrounding the development and deployment of AI technologies in society.

Task description:

This is an individual assessment designed to evaluate student’s ability to critically analyse ethical considerations arising from the development and deployment of Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems in real-world contexts. Students will be assigned a contemporary AI application or scenario situated within a realistic organisational or societal setting. The scenario will outline the purpose of the AI system, its operational environment, relevant stakeholders, data usage practices, and key ethical concerns.

The task requires students to produce a comprehensive written report of approximately 2000 words that demonstrates critical analysis, ethical reasoning, conceptual understanding, and professional academic communication. The report must evaluate the ethical implications of the AI application, assess risks and governance challenges, and propose well-reasoned recommendations to support responsible AI development and deployment.

This assessment aims to simulate a professional ethical review of an AI solution. Students will be required to:

• Analyse the assigned AI scenario and identify key ethical issues and stakeholders
• Examine potential risks including bias, fairness, transparency, accountability, privacy, and societal impact
• Evaluate the organisational, regulatory, and governance implications of deploying the AI system
• Propose evidence-based recommendations to mitigate ethical risks and enhance responsible AI practice
• Critically reflect on the broader implications of AI adoption in organisational and societal contexts

To complete this assessment, students are required to:

1. Critically analyse the assigned AI application or scenario, identifying ethical risks and contextual factors.
2. Evaluate potential impacts on individuals, organisations, and society, including issues of fairness, bias, privacy, and accountability.
3. Apply relevant ethical principles, governance considerations, and responsible AI concepts introduced in the unit.
4. Develop structured, evidence-based recommendations to improve ethical design, implementation, and oversight of the AI system.
5. Demonstrate academic rigour through clear argumentation, appropriate referencing, and integration of scholarly or industry sources.

The final submission must include:

• A structured written report (PDF, approximately 2000 words) analysing the AI scenario, evaluating ethical implications, and presenting recommendations.
• Appropriate academic references supporting ethical analysis and argumentation.

This assessment aims to help students:

• Critically evaluate ethical challenges in AI development and deployment.
• Apply responsible AI principles to realistic organisational scenarios.
• Formulate structured and evidence-based ethical recommendations.
• Communicate complex ethical and technical considerations in a professional academic format.
• Demonstrate readiness to engage responsibly with AI technologies in professional practice.

Structure:

This assessment must be submitted in an academic report format, including the provided assessment cover sheet from the ICT 902 Moodle page. The report should include an introduction, main body, conclusion, recommendations, and a reference list.

Formatting: This assessment should be submitted with a word count of 2,000 words using either Calibri or Times New Roman font, size 12. The document should be double-spaced, with a minimum of ten references in APA 7 format. The assessment carries a total weight of 30%.

• Headings and Subheadings: Use a clear and consistent hierarchy for headings and subheadings. For instance, main headings should be in bold and a larger font size, while subheadings should be bold with a smaller font size.
• Font Style and Size: Ensure consistency in font style (e.g., Calibri or Times New Roman) and size (12-point for body text). The entire document should be double-spaced with uniform paragraph spacing.
• Alignment: Keep the text left-aligned for better readability. The body text should be justified for a neat, organised appearance.
• Proofreading and Editing: Review your work for grammatical errors and clarity. Consider using tools like Grammarly or peer feedback to improve writing quality.

Due Date: Week 7

Resources Available: Lecture slides and notes from weeks one to ten. Videos available in the “Readings and Viewings” section of OASIS.

Guide: The guide below provides a concise overview of how to approach the assessment.

1. SCI Cover Page: (No word count)
2. Table of Contents: (No word count, structured outline)
3. Introduction (300–350 words)

• Introduce the assigned AI application or scenario and its relevance in today’s data-driven environment.
• Highlight the growing importance of ethical oversight in AI development and deployment.
• Outline how the report will examine the AI system, analyse ethical risks, evaluate governance implications, and propose responsible AI recommendations.

1. Body of the Report:

Paragraph 1: AI System and Impact Analysis (400–450 words)

• Describe the nature and purpose of the AI system (e.g., predictive model, automated decision system, intelligent assistant).
• Identify affected stakeholders, including individuals, organisations, and society.
• Assess potential impacts such as fairness concerns, bias, privacy risks, transparency limitations, or accountability gaps.
• Discuss possible regulatory or compliance implications where relevant.

Paragraph 2: Ethical Risk and Governance Evaluation (450–500 words)

• Identify key ethical risks associated with the AI system, including data quality concerns, bias in training data, model opacity, or decision-making autonomy.
• Evaluate organisational responsibility, governance structures, and oversight mechanisms.
• Assess risk severity, potential harm, and long-term societal implications.
• Integrate relevant ethical principles and responsible AI concepts introduced in the unit.

Paragraph 3: Responsible AI Strategy and Mitigation Framework (450–500 words)

• Propose a structured strategy to mitigate identified ethical risks.
• Recommend governance mechanisms, transparency practices, monitoring processes, or policy interventions.
• Discuss accountability structures, fairness auditing, and continuous evaluation mechanisms.
• Justify recommendations using scholarly and industry sources.

1. Conclusion (200–250 words)

• Summarise the key ethical concerns identified in the analysis.
• Reflect on the importance of responsible AI governance in sustaining trust and legitimacy.
• Emphasise the long-term benefits of embedding ethical principles into AI system design and deployment.

1. Recommendations (250–300 words)

• Provide clear, actionable recommendations to strengthen ethical AI development and oversight.
• Suggest improvements to governance frameworks, data practices, transparency mechanisms, or monitoring processes.
• Present a structured roadmap for responsible and sustainable AI implementation.

1. References (No word count)

• Minimum 10 credible academic and industry sources cited in APA 7 format.
• Sources may include academic journals, government guidelines, industry frameworks, and professional standards related to AI ethics and governance.

Total Word Count: 2,000 words

This includes ethical analysis, governance evaluation, responsible AI strategy development, and structured recommendations. The report must integrate conceptual understanding and critical reasoning aligned with ethical principles and responsible AI practice discussed in the unit.

Assessment submission

Before the due date, each group is allowed three (3) submission attempts, providing an opportunity to check for unintended plagiarism using text-matching software. As a team, review the similarity report together, discuss any necessary revisions, and ensure your final submission reflects the original work. If the similarity score is 31% or higher, collaborate to revise the content before making your final submission, as high similarity may indicate academic misconduct.

Academic Integrity and Misconduct

Students must submit original work and uphold academic integrity at Southern Cross Institute (SCI). The Academic Integrity Policy and Procedure outlines the principles of academic honesty and details the consequences of misconduct, including plagiarism, recycling, fabricating information, collusion, cheating in examinations, contract cheating, artificial intelligence tools, dishonest behaviour etc. SCI utilises Turnitin to encourage proper citation practices and to detect potential academic misconduct.

Ethical Use of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) Tools

Refer to the Quick Guide for Students created by the Learning Support Team for best practices in using GenAI tools. While GenAI can assist with idea generation, structuring, and drafting, students must carefully review, paraphrase, and properly reference any AI-generated content if used. Overreliance on AI may raise academic integrity concerns such as fabricating information.

Creating a reference to ChatGPT or other AI models and software

As per American Psychological Association (2020), the reference and in-text citations for ChatGPT are formatted as follows:

OpenAI. (2023). ChatGPT (Mar 14 version) [Large language model]. https://chat.openai.com/chat

• Parenthetical citation: (OpenAI, 2023)
• Narrative citation: OpenAI (2023)

Note: Although here we focus on ChatGPT, they can be adapted to the use of other large language models (e.g., Bard), algorithms, and similar software.

For further details, please refer to the ICT902 Unit Outline and ICT902 Unit Assessment Guide for additional information or contact your Lecturer. Please refer to the next page for the marking rubric for Assessment 2.

NSG5000 – Role of the Advanced Practice Nurse: Transformational Leadership in Advanced Practice

Interview Questions & Interview Discussion Template

 

Name of Interviewer:________________________ Chosen Role: _______________________

Practice site of interview subject: Clinic   Hospital   University  Other___________________

*****Do not include the practice site name or the name of the person being interviewed*****

The interview subject gave permission to record their answers without identifying their name or the name of their practice site:  Yes      No     _______Interviewer’s initials

Questions: (For Week 3 assignment – only type questions; For Week 5 assignment fill in answers and data concerning the interview subject)

1.     Type question 1 here

a.      Type interview subject’s answer to question 1 here

2.     Type question 2 here

b.     Type answer here

3.     Type question 3 here

c.      Type answer here

4.     Type question 4 here

d.     Type answer here

5.     Type question 5 here

e.      Type answer here

6.     Type question 6 here

f.       Type answer here

7.     Type question 7 here

g.     Type answer here

8.     Type question 8 here

h.     Type answer here

We continue to see a variety of terrorist threats and actions impacting our society.
These challenges continue to influence how our institutions respond in a rapidly
changing and uncertain global environment. One area of study focuses on trauma and
terrorism. The fears and disruption, as well as other factors create psychological,
physiological, and societal duress. There is also the risk of passing the trauma to the
next generation.
For this final exam, please identify how we can assist those affected by trauma
due to terrorism.
Please copy and paste your response in the assignment section no later than May 2,
2026 (11:59 P.M)
Materials I posted from week 13 might be helpful.
I estimate that the length of the final to be around 3-4 pages and please use APA
reference and citation format for any sources you use to support your responses. You
have flexibility on how you approach the final exam question.