Category: Uncategorized

Nu553 Unit 5 assignment

In this assignment you will examine effective communication and shared decision-making modalities for patients, families, and the interprofessional team for both prescriptive and nonprescriptive drug therapies, taking into consideration determinants of health with regards to thromboembolic disorders.

• Access the Unit 5 template and ensure you complete your name and the required information. Use the headers in the template provided.
• Begin with an introductory paragraph on general considerations related to safe anticoagulation therapy and the role of these agents.
• Next include content regarding prescribing, communicating and educating with patients and families. Include lab monitoring considerations and safety in the home, medication compliance etc. Specific values of labs should be addressed.
• Address communication pathways with the interprofessional team. Pharmacy, nursing, physician, cardiology, intermedicine etc., regarding medical management.
• Next include content on shared decision making with these drugs. Address patients/ families and interprofessional teams separately.
• Finally in the commentary portions include content regarding nonprescriptive drug therapies that may interact or be contraindicated and why.
• Include content how determinants of health such as biology/ genetics and/ or comorbidities
• Finally provide a summary.
• Provide 4-5 sentences per section.
• Then complete the table component within the template. You must list one specific drug in each class and place the name of the drug under the class.
• Refer to your text and readings to help you choose a drug from the class. Include 2-4 items/ key points per section based on your literature search.
• The last section of the table should have content on the use of the drug regarding therapeutic monitoring, labs for monitoring and goals of therapy
• Refer to the required reading, resources and internet research to help you.
• The template sections will expand as you add content. Use key words with bulleted content or brief descriptions. Do not paste large content.
• You will have addressed 7 medications one from each listed classification.
• You may add the citation under the drug names. Include references on your reference page.
• Keep the headings within the essay portion bolded. Polish and keep the template and the table neat. Be sure the font is Ariel 10 within the table. It should be readable, meaningful, organized and not wordy.

This assignment will consist of an APA formatted paper.

Final Case Analysis

Each student will choose eight cases, each from a different chapter, from the readings in Weeks 1 through 7 (Chapters 1 through 16). The student may not use cases done in previous case analysis submissions. The paper should be divided into sections in which each case is under a heading with the case name and page number on it. A common reference page will be used for all of the cases.

Your responses should be well-rounded and analytical and should not just provide a conclusion or an opinion without explaining the reason for the choice. For full credit, you must use the material from the textbook by using APA citations with page numbers when responding to the questions.

Utilize the following case format.

Read and understand the case. Show your analysis and reasoning and make it clear you understand the material. Be sure to incorporate the concepts of the chapter you are studying to show your reasoning. For each of the cases you select, dedicate one heading to each following outline topic.

• Case: Identify the name of the case and page number in the textbook.
• Parties: Identify the plaintiff and the defendant.
• Facts: Summarize only those facts critical to the outcome of the case.
• Issue: Note the central question or questions on which the case turns.
• Applicable Law(s): Identify the applicable laws.) Use the textbook here by using citations. The law should come from the same chapter as the case. Be sure to use citations from the textbook including page numbers.
• Holding: How did the court resolve the issue(s)? Who won?
• Reasoning: Explain the logic that supported the court’s decision.
• Case Questions: Explain the logic that supported the court’s decision. Dedicate one subheading to each of the case questions immediately following the case. First, fully state the question from the book and then fully answer.
• Conclusion: This should summarize the key aspects of the decision and also your recommendations on the court’s ruling.
• Include citations and a reference page with your sources for all of the cases. Use APA-style citations with page numbers and references.

Human Resource Management Analysis

What do the results of each case suggest about employment regulatory issues and legal matters in organizations? What policies should HRM implement to prevent the legal issues addressed in your cases?

Category	Description	Points
Organization and Cohesiveness	The deliverables should be created and organized using provided templates or equivalent.	25
Case Analysis Content	All of the required content is fully addressed.	105
Human Resource Management Analysis	What do the results of each case suggest about employment regulatory issues and legal matters in organizations? What policies should HRM implement to prevent the legal issues addressed in your cases? What is the role of HRM in preventing the legal failures highlighted in your selected cases? What metrics would you use to assess HRM efficacy in addressing the issues in your selected cases? What is the role of technology, human capital, organizational culture, leadership, workplace planning and talent management in preventing such legal failures and in improving overall organizational success? Responses to each question must be informed by outside research. At least two references must be used and cited in this section.	88
Reflection	Students must address specific cases or concepts with citations. This section should not be shallow but show some deep reflective thought to receive full credit.	35
Documenting and Formatting	The deliverables should be formatted correctly as a business document and should use APA formatting for cited sources. Spelling and grammar must be accurate.	25
Certification Outcome A	Analyze and demonstrate an ability to implement and oversee mid- to senior-level human resource management (HRM) functions, including change management, employment regulatory concerns and employee legal matters.	4
Certification Outcome B	Synthesize the role of HRM and contribute to the progression and achievement of an organization’s strategic plan through partnership.	4
Certification Outcome C	Create metrics to analyze organizational performance and inform improvement initiatives, and strategically design objectives resulting in the efficient use of technology, human capital, organizational culture, leadership, workforce planning and talent management.	4
Total	A quality paper will meet or exceed all of the previous requirements.	290

1.  What is the role of HRM in preventing the legal failures highlighted in your selected cases?
2. What metrics would you use to assess HRM efficacy in addressing the issues in your selected cases? What is the role of technology, human capital, organizational culture, leadership, workplace planning and talent management in preventing such legal failures and in improving overall organizational success?

Responses to each question must be informed by outside research. At least two references must be used and cited in this section.

Reflection: (Include a reflection section.) This should cover all of the work in this course. Students must address specific cases or concepts with citations. This section should not be shallow but show some deep reflective thought to receive full credit.

Grading Rubric

Week 8: Final Case Analysis

Instructions

The Week 8 Final Case Analysis is due this week. The cases used are at the end of every chapter. Each case also has case questions that must be addressed. Review the Case Analysis Overview under Introduction & Resources for the description.

Remember to submit your assignment.

Action

Select the Start Assignment button to begin.

Once you have uploaded your file(s), select Submit Assignment.

Rubric

LMA.HRM593.Case.Analyis.Overview

LMA.HRM593.Case.Analyis.Overview
Criteria	Ratings	Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeOrganization and Cohesiveness The deliverables should be created and organized using provided templates or equivalent.	25 to >22.5 ptsExcellentThe final case study analysis paper includes clear evidence the student integrates professional HR competencies and uses practical HR management applications to ensure human resources are available, capable and effective. 22.5 to >20.0 ptsCompetentThe final case study analysis paper provides most evidence the student integrates professional HR competencies and uses practical HR management applications to ensure human resources are available, capable and effective. 20 to >17.5 ptsLimitedThe final case study analysis paper some evidence the student integrates professional HR competencies and uses practical HR management applications to ensure human resources are available, capable and effective. 17.5 to >15.0 ptsPoorThe final case study analysis paper provides little evidence the student integrates professional HR competencies and uses practical HR management applications to ensure human resources are available, capable and effective. 15 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe final case study analysis paper did not meet this competency. The paper provides very little or no evidence the student integrates professional HR competencies and uses practical HR management applications to ensure human resources are available, capable and effective.	25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCase Analysis Content Choose eight cases, each from a different chapter, from the readings in Weeks 1 through 7 (Chapters 1 through 16). The student may not use cases done in previous case analysis submissions. The paper should be divided into sections where each case is under a heading with the case name and page number on it. A common reference page will be used for all the cases. For each of the cases selected, dedicate one heading to each following outline topic. • Case: (Identify the name of the case and page number in the textbook.) • Parties: (Identify the plaintiff and the defendant.) • Facts: (Summarize only those facts critical to the outcome of the case.) • Issue: (Note the central question or questions on which the case turns.) • Applicable Law(s): (Identify the applicable laws.) Use the textbook here by using citations. The law should come from the same chapter as the case. Be sure to use citations from the textbook including page numbers. • Holding: (How did the court resolve the issue(s)? Who won?) • Reasoning: (Explain the logic that supported the court’s decision.) • Case Questions: (Explain the logic that supported the court’s decision.) Dedicate one subheading to each of the case questions immediately following the case. First, fully state the question from the book and then fully answer. • Conclusion: (This should summarize the key aspects of the decision and recommendations on the court’s ruling.) • Include citations and a reference page with sources for all the cases. Use APA-style citations with page numbers and references. – Integrate distinct professional HR competencies and practical applications in HR management to ensure that an organization’s most important asset is available, capable and effective in an ever-changing business environment. – Employ an interdisciplinary perspective for strategic leadership, HR management and decision making to add value to the overall success of a business enterprise. – Assess the culture and workplace environment and propose and make HR decisions that align with and help achieve an organization’s strategic goals.	105 to >94.5 ptsExcellentShow analysis and reasoning and make it clear that there is an understanding of the material. Be sure to incorporate the concepts of the chapter we are studying to show your reasoning. For each of the cases selected, dedicate one heading to each following outline topic. 94.5 to >84.0 ptsCompetentThe paper did not include one of the Course Objectives or one of the knowledge, skills, and abilities from the course. The paper length should be a minimum of 10–12 pages and comply with all formatting and APA style standards. The presentation vaguely describes the purpose of the paper, a summary of the research, and conclusions, as well as a brief discussion of how the researched topic could benefit the organization and the people that serve in the company. 84 to >73.5 ptsLimitedThe paper did not include one of the Course Objectives or one of the knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) from the course. The paper does not connect with the concepts. The paper length should be a minimum of 10–12 pages and comply with all formatting and APA style standards. The presentation does not describe the purpose of the paper, and a lack of the research, and conclusions. 73.5 to >63.0 ptsPoorThe paper did not include one of the Course Objectives or one of the knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) from the course. The paper does not connect with the concepts and is not organized to the guidelines. The paper length should be a minimum of 10–12 pages and comply with all formatting and APA style standards. The presentation does not describe the purpose of the paper, and a lack of the research, and conclusions and is poorly executed. 63 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper and the presentation did not meet this competency.	105 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHuman Resource Management Analysis What do the results of each case suggest about employment regulatory issues and legal matters in organizations? What Policies should HRM implement to prevent the legal issues addressed in your cases? a) What is the role of HRM in preventing the legal failures highlighted in your selected cases? b) What metrics would you use to assess HRM efficacy in addressing the issues in your selected cases? What is the role of technology, human capital, organizational culture, leadership, workplace planning and talent management in preventing such legal failures and in improving overall organizational success? Responses to each question must be informed by outside research. At least two references must be used and cited in this section.	88 to >79.5 ptsExcellentEach HRM criterion was define in great detail in how HRM can prevent legal failures and those cases were identified. Metrics were explained and how the efficacy is relevant. The role of technology, human capital, organizational culture, leadership, workplace planning and talent management in preventing such legal failures and in improving overall organizational success was demonstrated. At least two references were citations were used in this section. 79.5 to >71.0 ptsCompetentEach HRM criterion was mostly defined in detail in how HRM can prevent legal failures and those cases were identified. Metrics were explained and how the efficacy is relevant. The role of technology, human capital, organizational culture, leadership, workplace planning and talent management in preventing such legal failures and in improving overall organizational success was demonstrated. At least two references were citations were used in this section. 71 to >62.0 ptsLimitedEach HRM criterion was somewhat defined in detail in how HRM can prevent legal failures and those cases were identified. Metrics were explained and how the efficacy is relevant. The role of technology, human capital, organizational culture, leadership, workplace planning and talent management in preventing such legal failures and in improving overall organizational success was demonstrated. At one reference were citations were used in this section. 62 to >53.0 ptsPoorNot all HRM criterion was defined in detail in how HRM can prevent legal failures and those cases were identified. Metrics were explained and how the efficacy is relevant. The role of technology, human capital, organizational culture, leadership, workplace planning and talent management in preventing such legal failures and in improving overall organizational success was demonstrated. At least one reference were citations were used in this section. 53 to >0 ptsUnacceptableVery small representation of the HRM criterion was defined in detail in how HRM can prevent legal failures and those cases were identified. Metrics were explained and how the efficacy is relevant. The role of technology, human capital, organizational culture, leadership, workplace planning and talent management in preventing such legal failures and in improving overall organizational success was demonstrated. No references nor citations were used in this section.	88 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflection Students must address specific cases or concepts with citations. This should cover all the work in this course.	35 to >31.5 ptsExcellentThe reflection section demonstrated deep reflective thought that addresses specific cases and concepts. 31.5 to >28.0 ptsCompetentThe reflection section demonstrated reflective thought that addresses specific cases and concepts but not in full detail. 28 to >24.5 ptsLimitedThe reflection section has minimal reflection with some reference to cases and concepts but not fully connected the material with the learner’s experience. 24.5 to >21.0 ptsPoorThe reflection section does not have a reflection referring to cases or does not have any relatable concepts. 21 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe reflection section did not meet this competency.	35 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDocumentation and Formatting Paper is properly formatted to APA guidelines. This criterion is linked to Learning Outcomes: References must be in proper APA formatting. Spelling and grammar must be accurate.	25 to >22.5 ptsExcellentThe paper is properly referenced according to APA guidelines, Spelling and grammar must be accurate. 22.5 to >20.0 ptsCompetentThe paper is missing one reference, but the student used APA correctly. 20 to >17.5 ptsLimitedThe paper is missing two to three references, and the student uses APA inconsistently. 17.5 to >15.0 ptsPoorThe paper is missing more than three references and the student uses APA inconsistently. 15 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe paper did not meet this competency.	25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHRM.CERT.PLO-A HR Analyze and demonstrate an ability to implement and oversee mid- to senior-level human resource management (HRM) functions, including change management, employment regulatory concerns and employee legal matters.  threshold: 3.0 pts	4 ptsExcellent: The case study analysis includes clear evidence the student integrates professional HR competencies and uses practical HR management applications to ensure human resources are available, capable and very effective. 3 ptsCompetent: The case study analysis provides most evidence the student integrates professional HR competencies and uses practical HR management applications to ensure human resources are available, capable and effective. 2 ptsFair: The case study analysis provides some evidence the student integrates professional HR competencies and uses practical HR management applications to ensure human resources are available, but not fully capable and effective. 1 ptsPoor: The case study analysis provides little evidence the student integrates professional HR competencies and uses practical HR management applications to ensure human resources are not available, capable and effective. 0 ptsUnacceptable: The case study analysis provides very little or no evidence the student integrates professional HR competencies and uses practical HR management applications to ensure human resources are not available, capable and effective.	4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHRM.CERT.PLO-B HR Synthesize the role of HRM and contribute to the progression and achievement of an organization’s strategic plan through partnership.  threshold: 3.0 pts	4 ptsExcellent: The case study analysis includes clear evidence the student employee’s strategic leadership, HR management, and decision making to add value to the company. 3 ptsCompetent: The case study analysis provides most evidence the student employees strategic leadership, HR management, and decision making to add value to the company. 2 ptsFair: The case study analysis provides some evidence the student employees strategic leadership, HR management, and decision making to add value to the company. 1 ptsPoor: The case analysis provides little evidence the student employees strategic leadership, HR management, and decision making to add value to the company. 0 ptsUnacceptable: The paper provides very little or no evidence the student employees strategic leadership, HR management, and decision making to add value to the company.	4 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeHRM.CERT.PLO-C HR Create metrics to analyze organizational performance and inform improvement initiatives, and strategically design objectives resulting in the efficient use of technology, human capital, organizational culture, leadership, workforce planning and talent management. threshold: 3.0 pts

In this assignment, you are reintroduced to the THS case study, which was used in the HIA610 course. You will use this case study for this assignment and for the final presentation in this course. In the Transformative Health System (THS) case study, a community health system is in a state of transformation. Shifting from inpatient care toward ambulatory, home, and virtual care. In this assignment, you will begin analyzing the future needs of the Transformative Health System. This includes exploring strategies to enhance their existing clinical data repository and develop a data warehouse. Also, consider how modern business intelligence (BI) applications support executive decisionmaking.

In your paper,

•        Explain the current clinical repository’s role in the THS strategy.

•        Propose three to five types of transactional database (source) systems that the THS currently uses that it should add to the existing clinical repository to support the expansion of its data warehouse strategy.

•        Describe at least three to five key data elements (basic unit of information) that are critical in each of the source systems you are proposing for expanding the THS data warehouse strategy.

•        Explain the nine documentation elements for a data dictionary for one of the data elements that you propose adding to the data warehouse. o Refer to the following section in your course text: Section 5.8.1: Documenting the Data Elements (data element name or label, alias, type in length of data field, default values, acceptable values, source system considerations, security considerations, responsible users in the description and comments)

•        Justify which of the source systems THS should prioritize first in expanding the data warehouse based on the organization’s strategic direction.

The THS Case: Transactional Database Analysis paper

•        must be 5 double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted according to APA Style.

•        must include a separate title page with the following in title case:

o   title of paper in bold font

▪   Space should appear between the title and the rest of the information on the title page. o        student’s name

o   name of institution (The University of Arizona Global Campus) o course name and number o instructor’s name o due date

•        must utilize academic voice

•        must include an introduction and a conclusion paragraph.

•        Your introduction paragraph needs to end with a clear thesis statement that indicates the purpose of your paper.

•        must use at least 4 scholarly, peer-reviewed sources in addition to the course text

Please develop an argument for OR against abolishing the juvenile justice system. What is the major benefit(s) of maintaining a bifurcated justice system (i.e., separate juvenile and adult systems)? What is the major drawback(s) of a bifurcated justice system?  Your argument must be based on theory and empirical evidence presented throughout the course and should integrate the readings for this week’s module.

In developing your response, consider these three questions: Does the JJS operate differently than the adult system? Would youth be negatively or positively impacted by abolishment of the JJS? Would abolishing the JJS save money?

Please make sure to upload a 3–5-page Word document with your answer. Assignments will be put through turnitin.com.

NUR571 Assessment 2: Interdisciplinary Nursing Case Report and Care Plan

• Assessment Type: Case Study
• Word Count: 2,500 words (±10%)
• Weight: 50% of course grade
• Due Date: Week 8, Sunday 3 May 2026, 23:59 (local time)
• Submission: Turnitin (PDF/Word)
• Referencing: APA 7th, minimum 10 peer-reviewed sources (2015–2026)

Purpose

This assessment challenges you to apply foundational knowledge of anatomy, physiology, and pathophysiology to a complex clinical scenario. You will use evidence and interdisciplinary insights to plan culturally safe, person‑centred care for an older adult at risk of deterioration. Your report must explicitly integrate the perspectives and contributions of Nursing, Social Work, and Speech Pathology to demonstrate a collaborative care model.

Important: You are expected to attend (or view recordings of) the interdisciplinary lectures in Nursing, Social Work, and Speech Pathology that explore Mr. Niko Costa’s case. Depth of interdisciplinary integration is assessed.

Learning Outcomes Assessed

• LO1: Identify and describe the structures of cells and the structures (macroscopic and microscopic) and functions of the circulatory, integumentary, musculoskeletal, and nervous systems.
• LO2: Determine the pathophysiological mechanisms and clinical manifestations of diseases related to these systems.
• LO3: Explain the concept of homeostasis and its role in maintaining stable internal conditions.
• LO4: Apply foundational A&P knowledge to support clinical reasoning and evidence-based, culturally safe, person-centred care.
• LO5: Plan safe and effective nursing care for individuals in aged care, extended care, or sub-acute settings.
• LO6: Critically reflect on strategies for countering ageism and promoting healthy ageing.

Case Summary (for this Assessment)

Patient: Mr. Niko Costa, 82, widower; lives at home with daily support from his daughter.

Key history: Ischaemic stroke (8 months ago) with mild right-sided weakness; atrial fibrillation (on apixaban), hypertension, type 2 diabetes, CKD3a, GERD, hearing impairment (often without aids), mild cognitive impairment with late-day fluctuation.

Presenting issues: Coughing/choking with thin fluids, wet/gurgly voice, 10% unintentional weight loss (3 months), two bathroom falls in two weeks, fatigue, orthostatic hypotension. RLL crackles; bedside swallow screen positive on thin fluids; functional decline (TUG 19s).

Medications (selected risks): Polypharmacy; anticholinergic burden (oxybutynin, quetiapine PRN); fall/bleed risk on apixaban; possible hypotension with metoprolol/perindopril; variable intake impacts diabetes meds.

Home & psychosocial: Cluttered bathroom, no grab rails, low toilet height, poor night lighting; carer fatigue; social isolation (ceased community garden/church); grief and loneliness; communication impairment (word‑finding, auditory processing).

Assessment Structure

Part A – Clinical Reasoning & Interdisciplinary Synthesis (500 words) = 20%

Use a structured model (e.g., Clinical Reasoning Cycle or ISBAR) to outline Mr. Costa’s presenting problem and risk of deterioration (e.g., aspiration-related respiratory decline, falls/injury—particularly on anticoagulation, hypoglycaemia with poor intake, delirium/cognitive fluctuation, dehydration/malnutrition).

1. Identify & prioritise problems (signs, symptoms, risks; connect to A&P).
2. Pathophysiology narrative for one primary diagnosis you prioritise (e.g., post‑stroke oropharyngeal dysphagia with aspiration risk; vascular cognitive impairment/delirium risk; orthostatic hypotension with falls; frailty/sarcopenia trajectory). Explain mechanisms → manifestations, interactions between comorbidities/polypharmacy, and impacts on homeostasis.
3. Interdisciplinary synthesis: Clearly state how Speech Pathology (dysphagia severity, IDDSI, safe‑swallow, communication supports) and Social Work (psychosocial stressors, carer burden, elder abuse screening, discharge barriers, service navigation) change your nursing priorities and next steps.

LO alignment: LO1, LO2, LO3 with integration of LO4/LO5 via interdisciplinary insights.

Part B – Evidence-Based Nursing Care Plan (1,700 words) = 45%

Identify four (4) priority nursing problems for Mr. Costa. For each problem, provide:

1. Problem statement: Concise, linked to A&P/pathophysiology and case data. (LO1, LO2)
2. SMART Goal: One clear, patient-centred goal (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound).
3. 2–3 interventions: Evidence‑based nursing actions that explicitly incorporate Speech Pathology and Social Work contributions where relevant (e.g., SP: IDDSI/strategies/communication supports; SW: home modifications, respite, meals/transport, ACP, carer coaching). (LO4, LO5)
4. Justification: Brief rationale with current scholarly sources (2015–2026). (Minimum 5 sources across the whole plan.)
5. Evaluation criteria: Define how you will measure effectiveness and how you will adjust the plan.

Common priority areas (choose based on your reasoning):

• Aspiration risk due to post-stroke dysphagia (wet voice, cough on thin fluids, oral hygiene, IDDSI adherence, FEES/VFSS triggers).
• Falls risk while on apixaban (orthostatic hypotension, recent falls, bathroom hazards).
• Medication safety/polypharmacy with CKD3a and anticholinergic burden (oxybutynin, quetiapine), health literacy/communication considerations.
• Nutrition & unintentional weight loss (risk of sarcopenia/frailty progression).
• Cognitive fluctuations/delirium risk affecting self-management/safety.
• Diabetes optimisation with reduced intake (avoid hypoglycaemia; realistic older‑adult targets).

SMART Goal Example (illustrative only):

• Problem: Aspiration risk related to oropharyngeal dysphagia, evidenced by coughing/wet voice after thin fluids, RLL crackles, and 10% weight loss in 3 months.
• Goal: Within 72 hours, Mr. Costa will tolerate IDDSI Level 6 solids and Level 2 fluids with ≤1 cough per meal, using SP strategies (upright 90°, small sips, slow rate, double swallow) and oral care 2–3×/day.
• Interventions: Implement SP plan and bedside signage; oral hygiene protocol; coordinate SW for mealtime setup, meals service, and carer coaching.
• Evaluation: Nursing meal observation tool; aspiration signs log; intake/weight review; escalation for FEES/VFSS if persistent symptoms.

Part C – Reflection on Interdisciplinary Collaboration & Healthy Ageing (300 words) = 15%

• Reflect on how Speech Pathology and Social Work input shaped your nursing approach (priority setting, feasibility of interventions, communication supports/hearing aids, cultural safety). (LO4, LO5)
• Identify one barrier to collaboration (e.g., siloed documentation, time constraints, delayed SP assessment, interpreter/hearing aid availability) and propose a practical solution (e.g., shared swallow plan template in chart; twice‑daily huddles; ISBAR that includes IDDSI and SW actions; pre-booked carer coaching). (LO5)
• Discuss how nurses counter ageism and promote healthy ageing in this case (strength-based language, autonomy, risk‑enablement with safeguards, meaningful goals like returning to the community garden/church). (LO6)

AI Use Statement – Assessment 2: Interdisciplinary Nursing Case Report and Care Plan

Generative AI tools may be used for this assessment with the following restrictions and conditions:

Students may use AI tools (e.g., ChatGPT, Claude, Microsoft Copilot) only for:

• Clarifying task instructions.
• Brainstorming potential topics or clinical reasoning steps relevant to Ron’s case.
• Exploring general concepts in nursing, pathophysiology, or interdisciplinary practice as a learning aid.

Students must not use AI tools to:

• Generate, rewrite, or improve any part of the written assignment (including grammar, structure, or tone).
• Draft or assist in writing SMART goals, care plan rationales, or reflective content.
• Generate or suggest references or citation content.
• Summarise academic articles or evidence.
• Submit any content that has not been critically reviewed and written independently by the student.

All academic writing must represent a sincere demonstration of your individual understanding, clinical reasoning, and evidence-based decision-making. Use of AI must be acknowledged in a brief AI statement included at the end of the submission (e.g., under the heading “AI Use Declaration”).

Any inappropriate use of AI or failure to declare AI use will be considered a breach of academic integrity and managed according to CDU policy.

Rubric and Marking Breakdown

For this Assessment you will be assessed against the following Learning Outcomes:

LO1 Analyse financial statements and corporate structures to assess financial health and performance.

LO2 Apply investment and financing principles to support corporate decisions.

LO3 Evaluate capital markets and pricing models in the context of risk management.

LO4 Critically assess capital structure theories and strategies within various market conditions.

LO5 Apply financial theories to international case studies, incorporating economic, social, and cultural dimensions.

 

ASSIGNMENT DETAILS

Assignment Title: Company Valuation Report – [Company Name]

Assessment Overview

This module is assessed entirely through a 2,500-word (+/- 10%) individual coursework. The assignment requires you to produce an independent company valuation report on a publicly listed company of your choice from the FTSE100. You must use real financial data, apply appropriate corporate finance valuation models, and demonstrate analytical judgement in interpreting the results. The aim is to assess your ability to integrate financial theory with real-world company performance and to form a defensible investment decision.

Your report must go beyond mechanical calculation. Strong submissions will justify assumptions, reconcile conflicting valuation indicators, and contextualise numerical results within broader market, industry, and strategic considerations.

Report Structure and Requirements

Your analysis must be organised into the following sections:

1. Introduction

Provide a concise overview of the company and explain why it has been selected for valuation. Conclude this section with a brief roadmap outlining the structure of your report.

2. Company Background

Present a brief history and description of core business activities; key markets, revenue segments, and competitive positioning; financial trends and performance indicators relevant to your valuation; macroeconomic, sectoral, and strategic factors that influence the company’s risk profile or growth prospects

3. Valuation of the Company

You must include the following four components. All assumptions should be referenced, justified, and consistent with financial theory.

Cost of capital: Estimate cost of equity and WACC. Justify assumptions on beta, market premium, risk-free rate, debt, etc. Cash flow estimation: Calculate free cash flow to firm/equity. Adjust for R&D, capex, lease, etc. Growth and terminal value: Use varied growth rates, terminal value estimates and explain rationale. Relative valuation: Compare your firm to peers (international or domestic). Justify adjustments and assumptions. 4. Discussions and Conclusions

Summarise and interpret the results of your valuation. Present valuation outcomes under base-case and alternative scenarios. Identify limitations of your analysis, such as data constraints, model sensitivities, or market uncertainties.

5. References

Cite all data, theories, and models appropriately.  Use APA 7th style referencing consistently throughout.

Data sources may include annual reports, company filings, Bloomberg, Yahoo Finance, Statista, OECD, IMF, FT Market Data, academic journals, and recognised textbooks

Assessment task:

You are an ambitious entrepreneur leading a team of individuals in an organisation. You are required to produce a 3,000-word portfolio (+/-10%) excluding references. You are to critically analyse management within an organisation, teamwork, organisational culture and employee’s motivation. The portfolio should demonstrate an entrepreneurial mindset, supported by research; innovative strategies and include clear recommendations to address identified limitations.

You must select one organisation from the list provided and evaluate it from a management and leadership perspective, particularly in relation to teamwork and organisational culture. The assessment needs to critically examine how management and leadership influence teamwork performance and workplace culture, and how these factors contribute to organisational success.

Your evaluation should present a critical analysis identifying key management and leadership issues affecting teamwork and culture within an organisation and propose practical, innovative solutions grounded in academic research. Below is the list of organisations to choose from:

List of Organisations:

Northern Gas and Power BBC UK PwC UK Boots Sports Direct Royal Mail Evri Ryanair Overview:

You are required to provide a portfolio which should be structured around the following key themes, all of which must be addressed to successfully pass the module:

Entrepreneurial Mindset Organisational Culture and Teamwork Motivational Techniques for Team Success Management Challenges and Limitations Innovative Recommendations and strategies Each section must address the specified requirements, and credible sources must be used throughout. The report must adhere to the Oxford Brookes University Harvard Referencing Style.

Introduction (LO2, LO4)

Critical assessment of an entrepreneurial mindset. Evaluate the entrepreneurial organisation and its characteristics. Teamwork (LO1, LO3)

Critically evaluate intrapreneurial managers and leaders of the chosen organisation with evidence from teamwork theories. Culture (LO1, LO3)

Critically evaluate the culture of the chosen organisation. Motivational Techniques (LO1, LO3)

Focus on motivational techniques within organisations, and their importance with relation to the business. Conclusion & Recommendations (LO2, LO4)

Critically evaluate the organisation and provide suitable limitations of the organisation in relation to culture, teamwork, motivational techniques of managers/ leaders. Provide suitable recommendations through innovation for organisations to follow in relation to the limitations. Reflection (LO1, LO2, LO3, LO4)

Reflect critically on yourself as a future entrepreneur leading a team of individuals with relation to culture of the organisation and teamwork. Bring in your self-assessment results as supporting evidence. As a future entrepreneur what sorts of team building activities would help with teamwork and fostering a positive working culture. Provide examples with support from self-assessments. Appendices Can include two of the following self-assessment results and be referred to in the main text:

“How entrepreneurial are you” test Myer Briggs Test results Belbin Test results Johari Window

You will produce a comprehensive group presentation on a social enterprise of your choice, (other than the 5 listed below) their aims and values, what they do, their impact, and the challenges they face.

Ensure your tutor approves your choice of social enterprise before starting to research.

Do not approach the following 5 Social Enterprises – Bicycle Works, Community Wood Recycling, Community/Company Shop, Change Please or Big River Bakery social enterprises.  Do not worry, there are literally thousands more Social Enterprises to choose from.

See additional support notes for guidance on what to include and how to format your slides.

You will need to use the research and knowledge gained from the two formative assessments that you completed as a group to develop formative slides and presentation outlining your findings, analysis, and recommendations/solutions to the client. You need to quote from and refer to the answers you received to your interview questions within your summative presentation.

You will be guided and supported through the assignments and will receive constructive feedback and comments from the tutor to improve your work in readiness for final submission.

Suggested basic structure and format of slides:

Front/title slide Contents slide – numbered slides Introduction to Social Enterprise, the industry and the purpose of this work Your chosen Social Enterprise Mission, vision, values, aims and objectives of your chosen Social Enterprise Legal structure and governance Funding Impact / SROI Challenges Opportunities Recommendations References in accordance with Solant Harvard Rules and Policies

Case Study:

The Task

Working in groups of max. 4 you are required to deliver a twenty-minute presentation that explores the role of customer experience in delivering competitive advantage for a company of your choice (subject to approval by your tutor).

You are essentially required to offer an analysis and critique of the live case study customer experience using models, theories and approaches introduced on the module, as well as offering recommendations for enhancement. You are encouraged to use a ‘live’ client whenever possible as this will likely give you better access to data and research opportunities as well as potentially increasing your employability.

This is an academic presentation that requires you to demonstrate your research skills as well as those related to critical analysis and synthesis. You are expected to apply customer experience-related theories and models to the live case study, but you are also expected to treat these theories and models discursively. The content of the presentation should be reflective of the topics and readings introduced during the module, you are also, encouraged to extend your knowledge beyond the confines of the module as well as synthesising your previous learning.

The presentation should be supported by the following:

A customer journey map showing the enhanced customer experience Fully referenced visuals aids Fully referenced 3,000-word script You need to have determined your groups and agreed the groups with your tutor by the fourth week of teaching. Any students who have not agreed a group by this date will be allocated a group by the tutor. You can choose to work on your own.

Each member of the group is required to fully engage with the task and the work should be divided equitably between team members. You should make a record of your individual contributions and include these as part of your assessment. You will also need to include your group contract. You will be awarded a mark individually based on the quality of your work, and the degree to which this reflects, supports, or is consistent with other members of the group

Giger and Davidhizar’s Transcultural Assessment
Model
Choose one cultural group reviewed within this course. Using Giger and Davidhizar’s Transcultural
ssessment Model, perform a comprehensive assessment of how your selected cultural groupâC™* s beliefs
and practices might impact healthcare decision-making, treatment adherence, your communication, your
interventions, and your education to align with the patient’s cultural values and preferences.